this is insane part... I am desperate of it.Just a note, remember to include in your costs your time to decide and impliment .
like 4 single cores?personaly, id be using 4 separate cables , of different colours .
this is insane part... I am desperate of it.Just a note, remember to include in your costs your time to decide and impliment .
like 4 single cores?personaly, id be using 4 separate cables , of different colours .
what do you mean by a corethis is insane part... I am desperate of it.but how else make it done?
like 4 single cores?
I would use four CONDUCTOR (core) cable because it will be simpler to work with, and a bit less susceptible to interference pickup.AND it might possibly cost less. than four similar wires.what do you mean by a core
probably true a single cable is easier,I would use four CONDUCTOR (core) cable because it will be simpler to work with, and a bit less susceptible to interference pickup.AND it might possibly cost less. than four similar wires.
The reasoning behind that assertion is that in a single, multi-conductor bundle, any impinging field, either electrostatic or magnetic, would produce only a common mode voltage in any pair of conductors because of their closer proximity. Non-bundled conductors may have different voltages induced because of being spaced farther apart in the impinging field. At least, that is the logic that has lead to the almost universal use of twisted pairs cables for low level audio applications. Rejecting common mode voltages while receiving the differential mode voltage is a mature process.probably true a single cable is easier,
worry is the colour coding could mean something to some one else.
also, 4 separate cables are more flexible for a flexible conduit
so as I say, id normaly use separate cables.
@MisterBill2 , refering to the posters 4 core question, you say a singer cable with 4 cores would be less susceptible to interference pickup, can you expand on the though please.
@MisterBill2The reasoning behind that assertion is that in a single, multi-conductor bundle, any impinging field, either electrostatic or magnetic, would produce only a common mode voltage in any pair of conductors because of their closer proximity. Non-bundled conductors may have different voltages induced because of being spaced farther apart in the impinging field. At least, that is the logic that has lead to the almost universal use of twisted pairs cables for low level audio applications. Rejecting common mode voltages while receiving the differential mode voltage is a mature process.
As for interpreting the "color code" , I have not come across any "code", but only conventions followed in a single application. The colors in a single multiple conductor cover are only to identify which wire is which, avoiding the need for continuity checking.
Mains voltage power cords are the exception, with a fairly standard set of colors identifying "HOT"(line), Neutral, and safety ground..
I think your missing the question there @MisterBill2Four conductor cable used for mains circuits applications is entirely different in appearance and in how it is constructed. The common application is for "three-way" lighting switching. In that application, red and black are the alternately connected "hot" feeds to the second switch, and the white neutral and the green safety ground just pass thru the junction box.
And in posy #27 is the first time that I have seen any mention of MAINS use for the wires in the walls. I did see one mention of 50 volts, with no hint of the application. Mains power distribution is an entirely different world. Different rules and regulations and a whole set of different practices and requirements.