Glad I'm not a passenger

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,357
It's not a warship being targeted AND hit, it's a slow, predictable path commercial goods transport in a pretty narrow shipping lane with no countermeasures or weapons.
The ASBM used here does have terminal guidance but it has a very limited homing cone to the target in the terminal stage. The US is targeting the sensor network of the Iran/Houthi launch sites.

The US Navy can easily handle the current threat but given time, one will slip though.
https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2013/navy/2013ssds.pdf
 
Last edited:

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,357
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/15/us-navy-seals-missing-gulf-of-aden-somalia

The Navy recognized the boat as one with a history of transporting illegal weapons from Iran to Somalia, said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss details not made public.

The Seals were on the USS Lewis B Puller, a Navy expeditionary sea base vessel, and traveled in small special operations combat craft driven by naval special warfare crew to get to the boat. As they were boarding it in rough seas, at approximately 8pm local time, one Seal got knocked off by high waves and a teammate went in after him. Both are missing.

The team boarding the small boat was facing about a dozen crew members. The crew members, who were taken into custody, had no paperwork, which allowed a search of the vessel. The weapons were confiscated, and the boat was sunk, a routine procedure that usually involves blowing open holes in the hull.
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,939
It has always bewildered me how these civil asset forfeiture laws ever got passed, let alone haven't been thrown out by every court that has ever had the opportunity to rule on them. I also can't understand why this hasn't resulted in a huge class-action lawsuit.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,357
It has always bewildered me how these civil asset forfeiture laws ever got passed, let alone haven't been thrown out by every court that has ever had the opportunity to rule on them. I also can't understand why this hasn't resulted in a huge class-action lawsuit.
The reason is obvious, it's policing for money.
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,939
The reason is obvious, it's policing for money.
Oh, I understand why the executive branch loves it -- I'm just very dismayed that the judicial branch won't do their job and throw it out. It strikes me as a direct violation of due process, and I simply don't buy the bullcrap argument that they are somehow only taking action against the seized asset and not against the person when the fifth amendment specifically includes property.
 
Top