If you are allowed up to two resistors for Rin and Rf, then this definitely can be solved, without going outside the given decade.I think were allowed a 1% error. My only question would be, with only being able to use these standard resistor values...if I use the 2ohm, the next size up would be a milliohm right? How could I use 2 X 10^1. Wouldn't that exceed my resistor values from the table?
I think you are correct. Nowhere in the statement of the problem does it say that he has other decades available.Maybe this is an examination for clairvoyants? Seriously though, using two resistors per element, four in total, there are exact solutions just using this list. Isn't that likely to be what the examiner was after?
Then the two tables were titled Standard Resistor Values and Standard Capacitor Values.Using only standard values of resistors and capacitors, design ...
Yes, and that solution does not require the 1.7 ohm resistor, and does not require excluding the 1.8 ohm resistor. Hence, that is a typo, and one that will just confuse a student new to the subject. Hopefully, it was an honest mistake and not a pointless change.With four resistors used in total, no decade multiplier is needed. Series and parallel...
No, it said "when trying to achieve a specific value of resistance, you may use no more than 2 resistors in combination".Unfortunately the problem statement also includes ... using two resistors.
I wouldn't say clearly.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|S||opamp non-inverting gain, wrong in spice sim||PCB Layout , EDA & Simulations||51|
|K||Gain of dominant-pole compensation with inverting and non-inverting error amplifier||Power Electronics||0|
|LM675 non-inverting gain amplifier not working||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||22|
|C||Microphone Filtering and Blocking||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||11|
|Open-loop gain, why is inverting vs. non-inverting different?||General Electronics Chat||7|
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Duane Benson
by Robert Keim