this is interesting that USA stand by lower voltage and it's still ok, meanwhile rest of the world wanted to change to higher, because of wire diameters, but America has the biggest power use and large buildings. I wish to have lower voltage in the house also because of costs because American appliances have visibly lower power use
I think you give America too much credit. I think our American system is the more primitive one. 120V at 60Hz is just what we standardized on because that's what was easiest to accomplish with the tech we had at the time we standardized on it. Nowdays I think we have a lot better options that we will never explore because we are standardized already. We pay the early adopter cost. Higher voltage, higher frequency AC would reduce the size of wiring and transformers; higher frequency magnetic materials are available now that weren't before. HVDC power transmission is now a reality since we now have cheap ways of stepping up/down DC.I'm just asking about it, because that system 230/400v proposed for global standard by International Electrotechnical Commission is actually ..... primitive a little, because it's over 200 volts even for smallest appliances, and in the U.S. it's used only for high wattage stuff and not even for all.
I think 50Hz is more primitive than 60Hz, But I think 60Hz is still primitive; 400Hz has been used in airplanes for a LONG time.
I think 120V is more primitive than 230V. I do not think we benefit from having a lower line voltage than the rest of the world. I do not consider 120V to be any safer than 240V. We just pay extra for copper.