MisterBill2
- Joined Jan 23, 2018
- 28,049
That piece by "Y" in post #179 is certainly scarey, to say the least. The very worst is that it is so reasonably believable that those not considering the secondary results of their actions could actually pass such rules. It seems to happen frequently in one of our far-western states here in the US.
It certainly does lead rational thinkers towards evaluating the claimed benefits of the total darkness concept for crime prevention. I have some inside information showing that the vast majority of crimes are done by lawbreakers, folks who refuse to abide by the posted rules. Thus making the possession of whatever may be utilized for self defense a crime, it assures that only lawbreakers will have such items. I see this as an intrinsically flawed logic.
It certainly does lead rational thinkers towards evaluating the claimed benefits of the total darkness concept for crime prevention. I have some inside information showing that the vast majority of crimes are done by lawbreakers, folks who refuse to abide by the posted rules. Thus making the possession of whatever may be utilized for self defense a crime, it assures that only lawbreakers will have such items. I see this as an intrinsically flawed logic.















