Yes Ghar, that sums it up well enough. I was thinking about this the entire time in regards to separate the magnetic field from the RF radiation. I don't know if much people on this forum understand that I'm not trying to do this through RF, but rather through magnetic field, so losing power from my transmitter is really not that much of a big deal. Even if I did lose power my input current will be very very low compared to the induced current in the secondary coil. So as long as I am within an acceptable vicinity of the magnetic field the efficiency should not be a major issue . I was hoping to create this massive magnetic field around a house by making the house itself a transformer, so any device inside the house would be able to be inside the magnetic field, and hence any device can be inducted to receive current and etc.
Like I said, I am not trying to do this through radio, but rather magnetic fields only. My objective is to have a small input current, and then create this massive strong magnetic field that can induce a current into any device within an acceptable vicinity dictated by the cube law. I know that the field is even worse when it comes to losing its strength: inverse cube law > inverse square law, but at least you don't lose hundreds of watts of power just to send 60 watts to a lightbulb right? You'll only be sending milliwatts of power and let the magnetic field do the transfer efficiently, rather than send 300 watts and get 60 watts at 30 feet using RF, you might as well use 70-80 watts and get 60 watts at, say, 10 feet, through magnetic field coupling, no?
???? confirm physicists! hehe
Like I said, I am not trying to do this through radio, but rather magnetic fields only. My objective is to have a small input current, and then create this massive strong magnetic field that can induce a current into any device within an acceptable vicinity dictated by the cube law. I know that the field is even worse when it comes to losing its strength: inverse cube law > inverse square law, but at least you don't lose hundreds of watts of power just to send 60 watts to a lightbulb right? You'll only be sending milliwatts of power and let the magnetic field do the transfer efficiently, rather than send 300 watts and get 60 watts at 30 feet using RF, you might as well use 70-80 watts and get 60 watts at, say, 10 feet, through magnetic field coupling, no?
???? confirm physicists! hehe
Last edited: