Whatever they do do, they do not remain motionless.If you don't know how to 'correctly' answer a question in at least 3 ways then you are falling behind in your knowledge base..
Whatever they do do, they do not remain motionless.If you don't know how to 'correctly' answer a question in at least 3 ways then you are falling behind in your knowledge base..
Touche! did not know there was a limitation when traveling alongside a natural occurring phenomenonIf you don't know how to 'correctly' answer a question in at least 3 ways then you are falling behind in your knowledge base..
Sure, charge carrier motion (drift velocity) is a requirement of the Special Relativity based answer to the magnetic field component effects in circuits that have EM energy flows. That's doesn't mean that physical particle motion is the actual electrical energy carrier, it means that charge carrier motion changes our view of electrical energy by modifying frame views of how the electrical energy propagates in space surrounding the conductor.Whatever they do do, they do not remain motionless.
That is quite brilliant! but you see... that's going to have to be a disclaimer the front caption on any post in bold letters on any analysis any one of us gives.That's doesn't mean that physical particle motion is the actual electrical energy carrier, it means that charge charrier motion changes our view of electrical energy by modifying frame view of how the electrical energy
I learned that long ago here.Touche! did not know there was a limitation when traveling alongside a natural occurring phenomenon![]()