Good morning,
I am curious as what the community's opinion on this topic are! I recently designed a prototype for a usb camera. The design has the AVDD and DVDD on the image sensor sharing the same voltage regulator (2.8V). I had a 0.1uF ceramic decoupling capacitor (201 package) located as close to the power pins on the image sensor as possible. The camera stream looked pretty good with just a little bit of noise in the usb camera stream, but not too noticeable. Took the prototype to a test center for radiated emissions testing. Passed with flying colors.
Then there was time to see if I could figure out a way to filter out the little bit of noise in the image. All I did was change the decoupling capacitor from 0.1uf to 4.7uF (same package), direct substitute. In theory, I assume that since the noise in the image completely gone after this change, that it would not make the radiated emissions worse than when it had the noise with the 0.1uF right?
Just wondering what the opinions are.
I am curious as what the community's opinion on this topic are! I recently designed a prototype for a usb camera. The design has the AVDD and DVDD on the image sensor sharing the same voltage regulator (2.8V). I had a 0.1uF ceramic decoupling capacitor (201 package) located as close to the power pins on the image sensor as possible. The camera stream looked pretty good with just a little bit of noise in the usb camera stream, but not too noticeable. Took the prototype to a test center for radiated emissions testing. Passed with flying colors.
Then there was time to see if I could figure out a way to filter out the little bit of noise in the image. All I did was change the decoupling capacitor from 0.1uf to 4.7uF (same package), direct substitute. In theory, I assume that since the noise in the image completely gone after this change, that it would not make the radiated emissions worse than when it had the noise with the 0.1uF right?
Just wondering what the opinions are.