Are you required to use an asynchronous (ripple) counter?I need help with counter scheme.
Counter count like that: 0 -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 8 -> 4 -> 3 -> 2 -> 1 -> 0
The same is true with most of the other outputs. That's why it's important to recognize the number of states in the sequence of outputs, not the number of different outputs.View attachment 207741
Sometimes the "4" transitions to a "1", other times the "4" transitions to an "8", and still other times the "4" transitions to a "3". How will the counter keep track of what to do with the "4"?
Are you supposed to display the sequence on discrete LEDs? Or on a seven segment display?I have to make synchronus counter from 4 j-k flip-flops and some logic gates. This counter has 3 states of work. And I don't know how to set circuit properly to this table
Full text for the problem would be helpful.Outputs may be displayed by binary probe
How do you arrive at "3 states of work"? What are those states?So table represents sequences.
I have to make synchronus counter from 4 j-k flip-flops and some logic gates. This counter has 3 states of work. And I don't know how to set circuit properly to this table;/
The OP mentions using four flip flops. If there is a limit of four, it really limits the design options. Maybe only one? IMHO, it would have to be a classic state machine designed along the lines I list in Post #13.It almost appears as though there are 3 different counters, and you are switching between them.
View attachment 207771
Only one what? Design option using four flip flops? If I'm counting right, I get about 3.5 trillion design options.The OP mentions using four flip flops. If there is a limit of four, it really limits the design options. Maybe only one?
Why would only being able to use 4 flip flops be a hindrance?The OP mentions using four flip flops. If there is a limit of four, it really limits the design options.
Not the detailed design, the general architecture. For example, the outputs could not directly be the flip-flop outputs. The FF outputs would have to be decoded to produce the count outputs. If more than four FFs, the outputs could be directly from the FFs. That kind of thing. Or, for example, the approach suggested in Post #14 would not work. That kind of thing. I hope this clarifies my assertion. Any more detail and I am giving away the answer to the OP.Only one what? Design option using four flip flops? If I'm counting right, I get about 3.5 trillion design options.
Not a hindrance. Possibly a limit set by the homework problem. Restricting the number of FFs can make a big impact on the design. I am glad to see someone reads my posts!Why would only being able to use 4 flip flops be a hindrance?
I'm still waiting for the OP to post the entire text of the problem. I was skeptical of the problem description from my first post and have asked for the complete text of the problem - twice.Restricting the number of FFs can make a big impact on the design.
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Don Wilcher