djsfantasi
- Joined Apr 11, 2010
- 9,237
Ok, I like to stretch things with wack analogies. I regret having done so now.
However, I still can doubt the veracity of a conclusion based on statistics. First, a pandemic’s statistics are difficult to trust. The ways they are reported introduce a lot of error. I believe that trustworthy statistics will only become available in the future. Does any conclusion drawn today have a confidence factor that makes a drawn conclusion strong? Secondly, many people recognize that China likely has misreported their statistics. Which renders that data useless.
So am I to trust a statistician whose data is inherently unreliable? Or the physician whose specialty is infectious disease and has been working in the field for many years.
However, I still can doubt the veracity of a conclusion based on statistics. First, a pandemic’s statistics are difficult to trust. The ways they are reported introduce a lot of error. I believe that trustworthy statistics will only become available in the future. Does any conclusion drawn today have a confidence factor that makes a drawn conclusion strong? Secondly, many people recognize that China likely has misreported their statistics. Which renders that data useless.
So am I to trust a statistician whose data is inherently unreliable? Or the physician whose specialty is infectious disease and has been working in the field for many years.
