Excellent article (and an old one at that... it's from 96!) ... thanks Max
Excellent article (and an old one at that... it's from 96!) ... thanks Max
Hi,Well.. I've done several automated measuring machines, the last one was a $200K project. Right now I'm finishing a $120k CNC dual-head drilling machine that's destined to an automotive harness assembly facility in south america that has a work area of 4' x 25'. The machine is 33 feet long and 5-1/2 foot wide. I designed every single part of it, except for the servos and spindles of course... and several linear motion components. I also designed and programmed its motion control circuitry and software.
This is the problem with Fanuc, the PLC (Fanuc PMC) is built in, as in just about all CNC controllers, But with Fanuc you need the eprom programming unit, One advantage to many others such as Mitsubishi etc, the PLC is available to be programmed/modified, on screen if necessary.I have retrofitted the 50HP DC spindle drive on an old Fanuc machining center (and programmed a PLC for it to communicate with Fanuc system) but that is the extent of my CNC experience.
It was a simple problem. The spindle speed signal from Fanuc system to the old drive (Hitachi? IIRC) was a 12 bit digital signal. As in 12 separate digital I/O. The new Bardac drive wanted a +/-10v signal. The plc program was the simplest one I ever wrote. 1 rung. Treated the whole DI card as a channel, with a MOV command to an analog output. Then scaled the input signal in the drive (6v full scale I believe). Putting a full-fledged PLC in there just as a signal conditioner was a bit overkill but was the only thing I could make work on-the-spot and the customer gladly paid to have the machine back up and running with no downtime waiting for parts.This is the problem with Fanuc, the PLC (Fanuc PMC) is built in, as in just about all CNC controllers, But with Fanuc you need the eprom programming unit, One advantage to many others such as Mitsubishi etc, the PLC is available to be programmed/modified, on screen if necessary.
Max.
So you'd say you got the 80/20 ?
80% of visible observable change accomplished in the first 20% of the project? Yeah that's about right LOL.So you'd say you got the 80/20 ?
'Cause that last stage you've just mentioned will probably cost you dearly...