Good grief #13, if that is directed at me, what the heck are you on about. No one has proven anything to anyone at all. HAVE A NICE DAYAnd you were proven wrong in 6 minutes. Good-bye.
Good grief #13, if that is directed at me, what the heck are you on about. No one has proven anything to anyone at all. HAVE A NICE DAYAnd you were proven wrong in 6 minutes. Good-bye.
@#12: I could be wrong, but I don't think the TS was being sarcastic -- I read it as they were genuinely thanking you for pointing out that they might be chasing a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Again, could be wrong -- I can see how it MIGHT have been meant to be sarcastic. Hopefully the TS can clarify.And you were proven wrong in 6 minutes. Good-bye.
I didn't mean to imply otherwise - I was just reiterating the importance of it in this case because of how much heat it'll be generating. No offense was intended. Sorry if it came out wrong....Also, I have stated that the LDO *WILL* be attached to a heatsink. Thanks for replying
Lower the voltage to get more cooling?
So why not just short the device (i.e., zero volts) to get maximum cooling?
Are you familiar with how a Peltier works?
The device is specifically designed so that, over the intended range of operation, the Seebeck effect dominates the Ohmic resistance and thermal conductance effects so that the more power you put to the module, the more cooling power you obtain. They would be pretty useless otherwise.
I was thinking about this last night in bed and realize that I misread your post. I thought you were giving an OR list -- do any one of these things and it will make things colder. I realize now that you were essentially giving an AND list -- do all of these things and it will make things colder (though not strictly all of them).Dear Mr Moderator, I never suggested anything as stupid as zero voltage for max cooling - that is all on you.