You'd have to cut it in half 25 times. If each cutting in half required a 10% increase in power (~= current in this case) then that would require right at 10x the current or 220 mA.One problem is that most of us don't study how to burn up parts. Some old rule of thumb says double the lifetime for every 10% less power. If you don't actually melt the LED you are working with a, "shortened" life span. How short? I think you are going to be the pioneer on this research. This seems a stupid way to look at it, but how many times do you have to cut the LEDs life in half to get from 100,000 hours to 10 seconds? Even if you can do the math, the answer is not going to be reliable.
You're just going to have to burn a few of them up.
I agree that it is pretty unreliable, but that number doesn't seem too far out of kilter.
It might actually make a good local science fair project at this age to plot current versus lifetime for LEDs abused into lifetimes of a month and less.