My journey into power electronics started at Marconi in 1983, as a student, aged 18, involved in testing thyristors for the HVDC link between Britain and France. After a brief foray into IC design (because it looked trendier) I returned to power electronics in Professional Audio and Lighting - in those days it was phase-fired triacs switching big halogen lamps, sometimes low-voltage transformer driven, so I know all about inrush currents! Then moving lights with stepper motors. Designing audio amplifiers is an exercise in overload protection circuit design. That industry was destroyed by Chinese imports in the early 2000s. Now I'm in emergency and off-grid power.Hello again,
When you said there is no point it sounded like you were referring to the general overload operation so it sounded very strange. That makes you sound smarter now
But what kind of 'power' electronics did you work in.
When you now state different applications you didnt make that clear before this.
Yes a resistive load is different. In the previous post i quoted, the load is much different than a simple resistive load. My brother in law long time ago had the same problem when he tried using a gas generator to run a circular saw. The thing could not get the saw running because it was rated for the current the saw normally draws.
An oversized transformer is not an issue when reliability is the main concern. We did a project for a company i remember they ran their main frame computer i think it was in Newark NJ (this was a pretty long time ago). They did not order an inverter that was oversized. The converter, AND their computer power supply, blew up ... twice.
So again we have a different situation that requires a certain design.
But we had a saying in the lab, "Fools load", as a play on words for "Full load". That's because we ALL knew the general idea that you do not order a converter that will have to operate at the full load, you get an oversized one. This doesnt mean it is not tested for loads greater than that, including a short circuit, it just means the reliability has to be there and to get that it is not a good idea to order a converter that will have to operate at the full load on a continuous basis, which many do anyway and end up regretting it.
I wouldnt mind hearing your take on the same ideas but with a UPS system. For a UPS system you dont order a unit that will give you 5 minutes of run time if you need 5 minutes of run time, you order a unit that has at least twice the capacity.
Note in all of the above we didnt even take the manufacturer's honesty into account yet.
It's nice to meet someone who worked in power but it would be interesting to find out what kind of power devices and maybe max power and what you did there.
Thanks for the reply.
It's mainly 3-hour discharge systems for evacuation, not 5-minute UPS, but I imagine the lack of accurate battery data for that length of discharge is a real problem.
I deal a lot with Victron products - it is interesting that their 5kW inverters are rated 4kW continuous, and the transformers look as though they are no more than 3kW, but they have built-in thermistors to monitor the temperature. They also believe in using multiple (as in several dozen) TO220 transistors rather than the larger devices.
Generators have their own problems: Inrush (as you mentioned), but they don't like being run on low loads either, they really don't like leading power factors or highly distorted current waveforms