Project: Improved LaserJet PCB transparencies
I have been using a photo-resist method for making PCBs for over 10 years. Almost from the beginning, I used an inkjet printer and a high quality transparency film (Pictorico Premium OHP) for creating the positive image used as the exposure mask.
That medium is now becoming hard to find and expensive, so I reconsidered using a laser printer and the much less expensive transparencies that go with it. For this project, I used 3M CG3300 transparencies for laser printers and an HP4101 mfp printer set at its maximum resolution of 600 dpi and print darkness. The transparencies look dark, but under a magnifying lens, one can still see the dot pattern. The image in Figure 1 is a microscopic view of a pad taken with a 3.2X objective (total magnification approx. 40X). Figure 2 is a portion of an inkjet transparency for comparison. Note how the inkjet colors spread very slightly and fill in the gaps between dots.
I tried Pulsar green TRF, which can be ironed or laminated onto the toner side to give a truly opaque image. In my hands, that worked pretty good, but the transfer was not always smooth, sometimes left gaps, and always left slightly ragged edges.
As an alternative, I tried Dry Erase markers (Expo brand). I covered the entire PCB pattern (Figure 3). Then after it was dry, I wiped the image with soft facial tissue or soft toilet paper -- not the hard finish stuff one can find in some countries. The laser image was not smudged by the process (see: Hints) and the dried marker comes off quite easily. The little holes between the toner dots remained filled and the image was much more opaque when examined through a lens. Figure 4 shows an overall view of the untreated laser image (bottom) and the treated image (top) after removal of excess marker. Figure 5 shows microscopic views of the treated and untreated areas on a transparency.
As a test, of whether the improved optical density gave better results, an Injectorall 1-oz pre-sensitized PCB (PC17P from Digikey) was exposed and then etched in FeCl3. After development, the resist from the untreated image was noticeably rougher and had a ground-glass appearance. The resist from the treated image had the typical glossy appearance. After etching, the copper surface from the untreated image also had increased roughness and multiple tiny pits (Figure 6) as compared to the smoother appearance of the board from the treated image (Figure 7). The etchant used was very viscous, and I suspect that the difference between treated and untreated transparencies would be more marked, if a less viscous etchant were used. Newer printers at higher resolution might also provide better results and may obviate any advantage to using the Dry Erase treatment described here.
I sum, the sharpness and opacity of the transparency produced by this method is improved. A LaserJet transparency produced at 600 dpi and modified in this way is quite suitable for use as a mask for exposing photo-resists. It is not quite as good as the transparency produced with an inkjet printer.
Procedural Details:
1) Black marker seems to work best and comes off the easiest. It is harder to get all of the color removed from color markers.
2) Do not scrub with the marker. Just lay on a nice wet layer like when painting with water colors. The transparency image is slightly softened by the solvent in the ink and can be scratched by the felt tip if scrubbed.
3) Let the marker dry thoroughly (at least 5 min.)
4) The dried marker comes off in little flakes. These can also scratch the surface, if they get caught beneath the tissue and you scrub back and forth. Just wipe in one direction, then another, etc.
5) Fold the tissue as needed to get a clean surface. If you need to go back over an area, you can do that, but be careful.
6) Some types of regular markers might also be used, but the Dry Erase comes off easier and leaves a cleaner/clearer background.
With this technique, you can also touch-up localized areas, but it is easier just to color the whole thing and then wipe the excess off.
John
EDIT: 02.03.16 This method was developed using an HP LaserJet printer. Recently, I tried a Brother printer,and the method does not work with that printer. The Brother toner is not fused at as high a temperature as the HP toner is and is a different composition. It is softer, and the markers tend to scratch or remove it.
I have been using a photo-resist method for making PCBs for over 10 years. Almost from the beginning, I used an inkjet printer and a high quality transparency film (Pictorico Premium OHP) for creating the positive image used as the exposure mask.
That medium is now becoming hard to find and expensive, so I reconsidered using a laser printer and the much less expensive transparencies that go with it. For this project, I used 3M CG3300 transparencies for laser printers and an HP4101 mfp printer set at its maximum resolution of 600 dpi and print darkness. The transparencies look dark, but under a magnifying lens, one can still see the dot pattern. The image in Figure 1 is a microscopic view of a pad taken with a 3.2X objective (total magnification approx. 40X). Figure 2 is a portion of an inkjet transparency for comparison. Note how the inkjet colors spread very slightly and fill in the gaps between dots.
I tried Pulsar green TRF, which can be ironed or laminated onto the toner side to give a truly opaque image. In my hands, that worked pretty good, but the transfer was not always smooth, sometimes left gaps, and always left slightly ragged edges.
As an alternative, I tried Dry Erase markers (Expo brand). I covered the entire PCB pattern (Figure 3). Then after it was dry, I wiped the image with soft facial tissue or soft toilet paper -- not the hard finish stuff one can find in some countries. The laser image was not smudged by the process (see: Hints) and the dried marker comes off quite easily. The little holes between the toner dots remained filled and the image was much more opaque when examined through a lens. Figure 4 shows an overall view of the untreated laser image (bottom) and the treated image (top) after removal of excess marker. Figure 5 shows microscopic views of the treated and untreated areas on a transparency.
As a test, of whether the improved optical density gave better results, an Injectorall 1-oz pre-sensitized PCB (PC17P from Digikey) was exposed and then etched in FeCl3. After development, the resist from the untreated image was noticeably rougher and had a ground-glass appearance. The resist from the treated image had the typical glossy appearance. After etching, the copper surface from the untreated image also had increased roughness and multiple tiny pits (Figure 6) as compared to the smoother appearance of the board from the treated image (Figure 7). The etchant used was very viscous, and I suspect that the difference between treated and untreated transparencies would be more marked, if a less viscous etchant were used. Newer printers at higher resolution might also provide better results and may obviate any advantage to using the Dry Erase treatment described here.
I sum, the sharpness and opacity of the transparency produced by this method is improved. A LaserJet transparency produced at 600 dpi and modified in this way is quite suitable for use as a mask for exposing photo-resists. It is not quite as good as the transparency produced with an inkjet printer.
Procedural Details:
1) Black marker seems to work best and comes off the easiest. It is harder to get all of the color removed from color markers.
2) Do not scrub with the marker. Just lay on a nice wet layer like when painting with water colors. The transparency image is slightly softened by the solvent in the ink and can be scratched by the felt tip if scrubbed.
3) Let the marker dry thoroughly (at least 5 min.)
4) The dried marker comes off in little flakes. These can also scratch the surface, if they get caught beneath the tissue and you scrub back and forth. Just wipe in one direction, then another, etc.
5) Fold the tissue as needed to get a clean surface. If you need to go back over an area, you can do that, but be careful.
6) Some types of regular markers might also be used, but the Dry Erase comes off easier and leaves a cleaner/clearer background.
With this technique, you can also touch-up localized areas, but it is easier just to color the whole thing and then wipe the excess off.
John
EDIT: 02.03.16 This method was developed using an HP LaserJet printer. Recently, I tried a Brother printer,and the method does not work with that printer. The Brother toner is not fused at as high a temperature as the HP toner is and is a different composition. It is softer, and the markers tend to scratch or remove it.
Last edited: