Stop treating me like I am a witch and it's time to burn me. To you this may be impossible for a manufacturer to install 2 programs on 1 automobile

Its because you dont have 1 gram of brain and when someone tells you you just repeat! After all its not possible for us witches to be right that "THE SUN DOES NOT AROUND THE EARTH" !!!

I guess it could be just a scare tactic. It's just that 5G seems to be a dozen times more powerful than its predecessors that it just makes me wonder if there’s a catch?

Its not a scare tactic. Its just to test society's reaction. And society always does what its told. Its long known that tere are bad effects from all types of radio waves, phones, and such. Its public information that no one knows. Example: a similar situation is the fact that if I had told you the Automotive manufacturers have installed 2 softwares on their cars and they lie directly about the harmful emission, you would again not believe, but recently we saw that its true. Example: They are telling you that the dinosaur's farts caused the

ozone layer's death, whats the matter first there was no ozone layer problem, then it was caused by caw's farts now its dinosour's farts and the worst part is that there are those who believe it.​

 

I seriously doubt that 5G signals pose much of a health hazard.

There are billions using plain vanilla cellular devices and millions wearing Bluetooth devices. If they were really hazardous, we'd see dead bodies all over the place. So far, all the bodies I see on the streets are the homeless.

Remember all those claims that 60 Hz. transmission lines can cause leukemia? It was just another scare tactic cooked up by a bunch of ecofraudsters.

I agree with this - there are risks with most things, that is just the way it is

 

the dinosaur's farts caused the ozone layer's death, whats the matter first there was no ozone layer problem, then it was caused by caw's farts now its dinosour's farts and the worst part is that there are those who believe it.

Where do you get this crap?
Cows (and I presume dinosaurs) emit methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
It has nothing to do with the ozone layer (which protects us from uVB radiation) and is primarily depleted by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halon gases.

 

Where do you get this crap?
Cows (and I presume dinosaurs) emit methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
It has nothing to do with the ozone layer which is primarily depleted by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halon gases such as freon.

That was the official statement that they tried to pass. First it was the cow's and when that did not work it was the dinosaurs.

 

Words to live by; "Lately everyone LOOKS and noone THINKS!" Time to start practicing what you preach!

 

Words to live by; "Lately everyone LOOKS and noone THINKS!" Time to start practicing what you preach!

Saying and being another sayer does not work against me. If you can not understand what I am doing and you only "LOOK" its best that you stop.

 

https://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1333537

There are plenty of people out there who are convinced that 5G is going to be used to control our lives and make us sterile.Last week, while searching YouTube for 5G tutorial videos, I came across the search term "5G technology dangerous." Curious as to what people are theorizing about this undeployed technology, I began watching. What I found makes little sense, but as we've seen, if people hear false statements frequently enough, they begin to believe what they're told. Conspiracy theories have been around for as long as anyone can remember. 5G is just a new one. People also claim the same conspiracies about Wi-Fi. So what are they saying? Well, two things: health issues and deliberate population control and reduction.

I haven't heard this yet, but I can imagine people claiming that houses painted with lead-based paint will be better for you than those without. You could also argue that there will then be a conspiracy by real estate brokers to claim that houses with lead paint are worth more than those without.

5G testing.

 

That's hilarious. I had no idea. It used to be nuclear power stations.

They have to have fear. Many don't feel alive without it. It's a drug. Must worry about something.

 

That's hilarious. I had no idea. It used to be nuclear power stations.

They have to have fear. Many don't feel alive without it. It's a drug. Must worry about something.

What? Me worry.

 

That was the official statement

Sorry, you need to show me where that statement is posted in other than a wacko website, before I believe it.
Cow farts have never been related to the ozone layer, only to global warming.
But there does seem to be a lot of BS floating around.

 

Where do you get this crap?
Cows (and I presume dinosaurs) emit methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
It has nothing to do with the ozone layer (which protects us from uVB radiation) and is primarily depleted by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halon gases.

This is a tough thread to read and I just don't get why people are so accepting about some things and so resistant to accepting other things without at least trying to evaluate the evidence in either case.

The DFT (Dinosaur Fart Theory) appears to have originated from the group that produced this publication. While I may be somewhat limited in my knowledge of the mathematics of flatulence, it seems like they did a job worthy of Lord Witherspoon and Paul Boomer (google them):

...we conservatively assume sauropod biomass density, averaged over the global vegetated land area, to be around 200,000 kg/km2. Other recent estimates of the biomass density of herbivorous dinosaurs are 80,000–90,000 kg/km2[4] and 7–24 times the biomass of extant large-bodied herbivorous mammals [5], which taking a value of 28,000 kg/km2 for mammals (Table 7 of [3]) gives a range between 186,000–672,000 kg/km2.

I must agree with Mr. crutshow as I do not see that they claim any relationship at all to holes in the ozone layer, although there seems to be a subliminal eye-burning message. In fact, the word "ozone" does not seem to be used in the report at all. The authors are speculating on what might have been responsible for a temperature rise in the Mesozoic era. There are, of course, many assumptions that they have to make (including whether the bacteria were even present to create methane). But no, I don't see how this is hidden information or a society test or has any relevance to modern global warming or anything that should be of concern to anyone who does not list "Studied Dinosaur Farts" on their CV.

Perhaps this is an exception to the "He who smelt it dealt it" hypothesis.

 

Perhaps this is an exception to the "He who smelt it dealt it" hypothesis.

 

Sorry, you need to show me where that statement is posted in other than a wacko website, before I believe it.
Cow farts have never been related to the ozone layer, only to global warming.
But there does seem to be a lot of BS floating around.

Global warming is caused by the ozone layer problem. When the ozone layer protecting from the Sun's radiation thins and brakes, this gives more heat to the earth and melts the polar ice caps, when those caps melt they go into the ocean and stop the 2 main heat baring currents (gulfstream) which leads to the problem. It might have been my mistake for this inaccuracy. The layer brakes do to the gasses released in the atmosphere, which also have a second effect called "greenhouse effect".

Its also true that the other problems are the greenhouse effect, but this is 1 whole problem.

This statement about the dinosaurs was loudly advertised, trying to convince that the modern automotive and industrial economies have nothing to do with the "global warming".

 

Global warming is caused by the ozone layer problem.

Not true.
Point me to any reputable source that states that.
The only thing the ozone layer does in filter out UVB radiation which has very little to do with the earth's temperature.

I'm beginning to think you are a troll.

 

Global warming is caused by the ozone layer problem. When the ozone layer protecting from the Sun's radiation thins and brakes, this gives more heat to the earth and melts the polar ice caps, when those caps melt they go into the ocean and stop the 2 main heat baring currents (gulfstream) which leads to the problem. It might have been my mistake for this inaccuracy. The layer brakes do to the gasses released in the atmosphere, which also have a second effect called "greenhouse effect".

Its also true that the other problems are the greenhouse effect, but this is 1 whole problem.

This statement about the dinosaurs was loudly advertised, trying to convince that the modern automotive and industrial economies have nothing to do with the "global warming".

I am not a trol. Even if I am inaccurate sometimes, what I say is certainly so.

"
For example, the CFCs that destroy ozone are also potent greenhouse gases, though they are present in such small concentrations in the atmosphere (several hundred parts per trillion, compared to several hundred parts per million for carbon dioxide) that they are considered a minor player in greenhouse warming. CFCs account for about 13% of the total energy absorbed by human-produced greenhouse gases. "


https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/climateqa/are-the-ozone-hole-and-global-warming-related/
I do not consider "NASA" a reliable source, but I think you will.

The fact is that small energies are also amplified by the "greenhouse effect" and they are not small, if the earth did not need an ozone layer to begin with, it never would have been a problem for the Sun to just burn us through. UV radiation, sun burn, buy a sun screen protector oil, the Sun is dangerous, you will burn badly! Global warmming, Ozone layer is not damaged and everything on the Earth is not dying, its in very small qunatities and makes no difference, but do buy a sun screen oil factor 100000000! Which one do you choose to believe? Of course any 1 side will make the other side unbelievable.

Like I said its 1 problem, to begin with. The ozone layer was one of the most important reasons life on the earth ever existed. Even if its not a part of the global warming, its still a problem beyond believe.

EDIT: Yes here I might have made a mistake to say that the "Ozone layer" is a part of global warming, but I stick by my words and I do say the problem is big with the environment and technology also.

 

There is a theory!! Don't shoot the reader! Earth has a supply of oxygen... Dinosaurs, like humans, need to breath! Plant life make oxygen!
Dinosaurs and humans wreck plant life and oxygen levels fall... Ozone is created by oxygen ( part there of )..

I'm not a scientist, but! when the balance is tipped somethings go to give... Oxygen levels measured in dense suburban area's are less than the required 29% some ( Manchester here where I live ) it was recorded once as low as 17%.... Makes you wonder why more humans are showing these signs.. Not 5g, 4g or other.... OCD is on the rise.. Autism, aspergers... The brain needs a good supply of oxygen...

Just my tupence!!!!

 

There is a theory!! Don't shoot the reader! Earth has a supply of oxygen... Dinosaurs, like humans, need to breath! Plant life make oxygen!
Dinosaurs and humans wreck plant life and oxygen levels fall... Ozone is created by oxygen ( part there of )..

I'm not a scientist, but! when the balance is tipped somethings go to give... Oxygen levels measured in dense suburban area's are less than the required 29% some ( Manchester here where I live ) it was recorded once as low as 17%.... Makes you wonder why more humans are showing these signs.. Not 5g, 4g or other.... OCD is on the rise.. Autism, aspergers... The brain needs a good supply of oxygen...

Just my tupence!!!!

The point was that technology is dangerous and they even try to pass the idiotism that "dinosours" caused global warming. If we are even convinced that dinosours caused the global warming, why is it that I am wrong about technology being dangerous, despite us being convinced that it is not? Its not like I am forcing you to accept it, but yes I stick by it.

 

The point was that technology is dangerous

Life is dangerous. 100% of participants die.

 

I'm beginning to think you are a troll.

And I believe the vaccine in post#10 needs to be given to dragons.

 

5G is showing a lot of potential though.
https://www.verizon.com/about/news/...ted-reality-virtual-reality-and-mixed-reality

So if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, I guess they'll just be brushing off any potential health dangers?