Would you still use 5G despite its potential health dangers?

Thread Starter

FineWire

Joined Oct 12, 2018
4
They say 5G is so fast, that it could replace your home internet. It will also allow the Internet of Things (IOT) to exist and tie all internet connected devices together. But there are reports saying that cell towers can cause “increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans”

https://healthfreedomidaho.org/potential-health-dangers-of-the-5g-cell-phone-network

Will you still use 5G?
 

Glenn Holland

Joined Dec 26, 2014
703
I seriously doubt that 5G signals pose much of a health hazard.

There are billions using plain vanilla cellular devices and millions wearing Bluetooth devices. If they were really hazardous, we'd see dead bodies all over the place. So far, all the bodies I see on the streets are the homeless.

Remember all those claims that 60 Hz. transmission lines can cause leukemia? It was just another scare tactic cooked up by a bunch of ecofraudsters.
 
Last edited:

justtrying

Joined Mar 9, 2011
439
I seriously doubt that 5G signals pose much of a health hazard.

There are billions using plain vanilla cellular devices and millions wearing Bluetooth devices. If they were really hazardous, we'd see dead bodies all over the place. So far, all the bodies I see on the streets are the homeless.

Remember all those claims that 60 Hz. transmission lines can cause leukemia? It was just another scare tactic cooked up by a bunch of ecofraudsters.
Could go either way. Remmeber when x-ray was discovered? Lead and asbestos were widely used in cosmetics. We wont know until we know. When we know it will be too late for many. This is just how we do things.

RF frequency has known effects on cellular level. How it manifests in an individual and when, we should find out in a few years... But the rates of cancer are going uo anyway and there has never been any attempt to look at why. Chemo therapy and the new gene therapy will continue to make money
 

Ylli

Joined Nov 13, 2015
1,092
RF is non-ionizing. It's effect on tissue is that of heating. If that heating is causing damage is still an open question.
 

BR-549

Joined Sep 22, 2013
4,928
Have you ever lived with a cable bill? Monthly extortion from a state approved monopoly. It's like the silk road in the 1500s. Only one choked source of spice.

Many are willing and able to take far more risk..... to cut their cable. Remember Columbus?

5G......I can't wait for THz.
 

ArakelTheDragon

Joined Nov 18, 2016
1,366
Sorry Crutschow but I disagree. The danger is extremely big as it is. Even at the moment radio waves, wifi, Gs, and all such things are bad for the health extremely!
If I avoided every "potential health hazard" I would shortly die because I couldn't do anything, eat anything, or live anywhere. :rolleyes:
 

ArakelTheDragon

Joined Nov 18, 2016
1,366
The proof does exist. Its very well hidden, however every radio engineer will tell you "Do not go near the tower". How is that radio waves are dangerous for planes (you can not even turn your phone) but not dangerous for humans? How is it that in some countries children are forbidden to use cell phones in schools except through special means and the entire shcool is with a "Faraday's cage"?
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,251
The proof does exist. Its very well hidden, however every radio engineer will tell you "Do not go near the tower". How is that radio waves are dangerous for planes (you can not even turn your phone) but not dangerous for humans? How is it that in some countries children are forbidden to use cell phones in schools except through special means and the entire shcool is with a "Faraday's cage"?
Are you trolling us?
 

crutschow

Joined Mar 14, 2008
38,322
The proof does exist.
How can you say there's proof if you can't show it?
But if you believe that, you should always wear your tin-foil hat. :rolleyes:
every radio engineer will tell you "Do not go near the tower"
The reason "every radio engineer will tell you "Do not go near the tower"" is that he's talking about a tower radiating a high power RF signal.
If you are not near, then there's no problem.
And I have no plans to live near one.
How is that radio waves are dangerous for planes (you can not even turn your phone) but not dangerous for humans?
Because the cell phone signal can interfere with some of the sensitive electronic navigation equipment on the plane.
Humans aren't equipped with such equipment.
 

Ian Rogers

Joined Dec 12, 2012
1,136
If humans are now living into their 100's on occasion!! I would have thought if micro waves were that bad, it would be going the other way!!!

I remember being told not to stand in front of the MicroWave.... Still did... Still here!
 

Thread Starter

FineWire

Joined Oct 12, 2018
4
I seriously doubt that 5G signals pose much of a health hazard.

There are billions using plain vanilla cellular devices and millions wearing Bluetooth devices. If they were really hazardous, we'd see dead bodies all over the place. So far, all the bodies I see on the streets are the homeless.

Remember all those claims that 60 Hz. transmission lines can cause leukemia? It was just another scare tactic cooked up by a bunch of ecofraudsters.
I guess it could be just a scare tactic. It's just that 5G seems to be a dozen times more powerful than its predecessors that it just makes me wonder if there’s a catch?
 

ArakelTheDragon

Joined Nov 18, 2016
1,366
Stop treating me like I am a witch and it's time to burn me.
Yeah, one of us isn't. Didn't mention you in my first post, so why do you think I meant you?
Its because you dont have 1 gram of brain and when someone tells you you just repeat! After all its not possible for us witches to be right that "THE SUN DOES NOT GO AROUND THE EARTH", you are looking at it arent you !!!
 
Last edited:
Top