VARIABLE HIGH VOLT/AMP DC POWER SUPPLY

Regected

Joined May 24, 2009
30
Water is diamagnetic as well as a dielectric. Being diamagnetic means that when an external magnetic field is applied, the water creates its own magnetic field perpendicular to the applied magnetic field. Diatomic oxygen and hydrogen are not magnetic, but single atoms of these elements do carry a charge and therefor would interact with a magnetic field. It is this interaction that make hydrogen form on one electrode and oxygen on the other.
 

beenthere

Joined Apr 20, 2004
15,819
The answer to -
The question remains if some one can provide an answer, at around 34,000 vac what type of radiation would be created?
- is X rays.

But applying that voltage to closely-spaced plates in water with electrolyte means there will be too much conduction for the voltage to get anything like that high. You are more likely to fry your flyback.

By the way, we are assured by the experts that there is a frequency that allows one to dissociate water with more than 100% efficiency. It is somewhere between (so we are assured) 6 KHz and 342 KHz. That's at least the published top and bottom figures.

Oddly enough, all the published circuits seem to have better than 10 - 1 frequency adjustments, which leads us to think that there just might be some flim-flam involved. Normally, if one has indeed found an effective frequency, it would be reasonable to stae it, and to publish a circuit with only a minor frequency trim.

But that is why we find the search for making water molecules fall apart to be a big scam. There are no published figures, only promises of great things to come, and please send money.

By all means, though, let us know if anything comes of your efforts. Please use good instrumentation and measuring techniques.
 

THE_RB

Joined Feb 11, 2008
5,438
The RB, thanks for reply. You hit almost dead on point on something I thought about around a year ago. Resonance, how could I resonate the plate stack or say just selected plates within the stack? That is were the micro waves and the CRT flyback come into play here. can not use plates within plate stack as antenna from RF source in conductive solution. Thought about injecting RF from outside the test chamber? Next question was could I some how tap into the radiation created after the 34,00vac sec of flyback and inject it into the plate stack? While pulsing the stack with low volt high amp DC??? What would that do to the electron pairs? After all we are just ripping the pairs apart in the first place , lets get them going faster and see what happens.
It's commendable to want to pursue research down some of the less travelled paths. BUT the amount of energy required to split H2O is very well defined. I'm no chemistry expert but my wife has degrees in chemistry and one of the things you find in chemistry textbooks is tables showing the electron bonds etc of different atoms. It takes an exact amount of energy to split H20, this amount of energy doesn't change, it's a fact relating to the 2 atoms, and that exact SAME amount of energy is released when you burn (recombine) the atoms.

As to splitting the molecule using different forms of energy that may have some credibility. The big loss in electrolysis is heat, from the water (and plates) acting like a resistor. If you can split the molecule with less heat given off as waste you could be on a winner.

Mechanical resonances definitely help to clear the bubbles from the plate surface and get them to the top. This is well worth research and one of the reasons the "hydrogen imparied" think they have just found the resonance of water molecules because they adjust their trimpot to xxkHz and it starts making a lot more bubbles. What they did was create a mechanical ultrasonic resonance that rips the bubbles from the plate surface like an ultrasonic cleaner rips dirt off surfaces, no magic there, simply meaning more plate area and more gas per second.

There's lots of research you can do that might be worth millions just in efficiency research. But there's no free lunch! Anyone that thinks that they can separate that molecule with LESS than the actual energy of the molecular bond itself has about the same chance of success building an antigravity machine. They should go to the library and look in a basic chemistry textbook. :)
 
Top