A long as it was little towns in Texas and Arizona, budgets destroyed, land trashed and their citizens threatened it was perfectly ok.Just another racist xenophobe.
A long as it was little towns in Texas and Arizona, budgets destroyed, land trashed and their citizens threatened it was perfectly ok.Just another racist xenophobe.

Who cares? I care more about the effect of DIE on healthcare, aviation, and education."You’ll love this bag longtime,"
https://www.foxbusiness.com/fox-news-lifestyle/qvc-apologize-customers-following-derogatory-email
View attachment 317576
I know but it shows how deep that tick has dug into the fabric of US business culture. You don't need a DEI office to know when something is stupid to say in a general public mailer.Who cares? I care more about the effect of DIE on healthcare, aviation, and education.
BTW, Full Metal Jacket was a good movie.I know but it shows how deep that tick has dug into the fabric of US business culture. You don't need a DEI office to know when something is stupid to say in a general public mailer.
Because of his polio he was unable to breathe for himself. He was unable to move or talk inside the metal casing, and would often go unwashed because he was unable to communicate with the nurses looking after him.
...
“I knew if I was going to do anything with my life, it was going to have to be a mental thing,” he told The Guardian in 2020.
Two hotels and several residents of San Francisco's troubled Tenderloin district sued the city on Thursday, alleging it is using the neighborhood as a containment zone for rampant illegal drug use and other vices, making residents terrified to leave their homes and businesses unable to recruit staff.
Plaintiffs do not seek monetary damages, according to the complaint filed in federal court. Instead, they want officials to clear sidewalks of illegal drug dealers and fentanyl users, violent behavior and tent encampments and to treat the Tenderloin as it would any other neighborhood where crime is not tolerated.
I have been instrumental in building the character of the membership of AAC.
They can't kick squatters out of your own home, but they can take the entire home, sell it and keep the profit.in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that local governments cannot take surplus home equity after liquidating delinquent taxpayers’ property to pay their tax bill. Typically, if a property owner is behind on her property taxes, governments will take the property, liquidate it, and use the funds to pay off the tax bill and any accrued fees. Most states then return any remainder back to the property owner. However, Minnesota and 13 other states maintained a practice of greedily pocketing any surplus equity instead of returning it to the rightful property owner.
That is what happened to 94‐year‐old Geraldine Tyler, the plaintiff in Tyler v. Hennepin County. She fell behind on her property taxes, owing $2,700 and another $12,300 in fees. Hennepin County took her property and sold it for $40,000. But instead of returning Ms. Tyler her remaining $25,000, the County took that money for its own use.
The Supreme Court correctly decided that this practice is unconstitutional. Writing for a unanimous Court, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that governments cannot take more property than necessary to satisfy a tax debt.