MaxHeadRoom
- Joined Jul 18, 2013
- 30,684
Yup, we are one of those that won the biggest lottery ever! 
Max.
Max.
If a person, of their own free will, joined enemy forces in active combat they would be shot on the battlefield or tried as a traitor and jailed for lesser crimes of indirect support and aid. I don't have a problem with taking them back on a case by case basis but there must be strict conditions on their movements and penalties for their past behaviors if it was short of high treason. People who commit treason can go to hell.Ottowa is presently in a quandry on whether to allow the the spouses of ISIS to return to Canada as they a afraid for their kids lives.
I see Britain has refused to grant a young girls plea for repatriation and the US are asking allies to bring ISIS prisoners home for repatriation!
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/vote-canadian-government-bring-isis-spouses-home-syria-155636053.html
Max.
Treason has a VERY specific meaning so it's foolish to use charges of treason in a political theater.There are many of the previous and current high office holders and employees that should be under treason charges now.
It's all so phony. Especially the so called security services.
Be specific ... What act?It was an act of war. It was the highest act of war. Much more infamous than a sneak attack.
If a person, of their own free will, joined enemy forces in active combat they would be shot on the battlefield or tried as a traitor and jailed for lesser crimes of indirect support and aid. I don't have a problem with taking them back on a case by case basis but there must be strict conditions on their movements and penalties for their past behaviors if it was short of high treason. People who commit treason can go to hell.
While I agree with your statement, I also think that a fundamental fact that should be taken into account when passing judgment would be the offender's age. It's not the same to join a terrorist group at 25 than it would be at 15. In the case of the latter, I'd say there would still be a sliver of hope of atonement.I say let them rot. You made your choice now live with it. Knowing there are no do overs just might keep someone else from doing the same thing. There are WAY too many people in this world worthy of our compassion and may never have a chance to get it.
As this story unfolded in his mind, he began crafting some lyrics, pairing the words with a minor-key melody. At the chorus, he switched to a major chord, to capture the fanciful triumph he imagined for the couple: they had found a way to cheat death and live on.
At 15 you deserve a second chance if you steal a car or rob a gas station. Murder someone or join a a group that murders and terrorizes, you don't deserve a second chance. You are well beyond the age of knowing what is right or wrong at 15.While I agree with your statement, I also think that a fundamental fact that should be taken into account when passing judgment would be the offender's age. It's not the same to join a terrorist group at 25 than it would be at 15. In the case of the latter, I'd say there would still be a sliver of hope of atonement.
I disagree... at that age, it's extremely easy to manipulate someone ... but let's leave it at that ...You are well beyond the age of knowing what is right or wrong at 15.
I wasn't sure which thread to post this at. In the end, I decided that it belonged here:
https://www.texasmonthly.com/list/the-secret-history-of-texas-music/the-way-1998/
And now the genie can't be put back in the bottle...I am speechless but nut surprised. Congrat Canadian courts, you just opened a huge can of worms that you didn't want to open.
I see the positive side. It gives a great incentive in the field to just drop another bomb on the terrorist instead of trying to capture them.I am speechless but nut surprised. Congrat Canadian courts, you just opened a huge can of worms that you didn't want to open.
And now the genie can't be put back in the bottle...