The war on cops, another chapter

Status
Not open for further replies.

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,325
You and the others taking your side in this are missing the big picture I think. While BonB killing is appalling, it's doubly so when the cops who are paid to protect and serve instead do it, many times when other means of stopping things could be used.
OK, make it double appalling @ 1.2 percent of the total. Badges don't give them special rights
to be appalling to victims either.
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/black-captors-torture-white-victim-rant-against-trump-cpd-says/
 
how about the war on "free inhabitants"?


made my day, :)
All the rights and none of the responsibilities aye? -- Sounds like good 'work' if ya can get it:D -- Sadly (for the 'arrestee') 'taint so:(;)

The cited article is merely by way of 'nationalizing the union', as it were...

Article IV (of the US Articles of Confederation) said:
“The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively…”
-- Emphasis added--

IMO that officer should be put in for the PSOMV for conspicuous patience and professionalism in the face of extreme imbecilic provocation:cool:


Best regards
HP:)
 

JoeJester

Joined Apr 26, 2005
4,390
it's doubly so when the cops who are paid to protect and serve instead do it
Other than a slogan, can you cite the code where the police "protect and serve". Like all government activities, the police are reactionary. It has to do with those pesky Constitutional Rights. The Minority Report, is about pre-crime arrests ... definitely afoul of the rights.

One thing we seem to forget in these discussions. The "talent pool" all entities get to tap is society at large. Till society improves the desired metrics, businesses and governments will continue to attempt to draw the best they can afford.

We could get rid of the police, but, you better practice your draw ... and I don't mean your best southern accent or artistic abilities. It will be all self-defense for some, and all offense for others. The only gun control is the ability to hit what you intend to hit. Gun laws protect those who don't obey the gun laws.
 

shortbus

Joined Sep 30, 2009
10,050
Other than a slogan, can you cite the code where the police "protect and serve".
And can you cite the code that gives them to "judge and execute"? Hasn't been that long ago that they shot to wound, so it went to trial. But I guess "I was in fear for my life" is easier in court than a civil suit for wounding. Especially if the victim was unarmed or not doing anything that required deadly force. The gun hold "X" number of bullets, might as well use them all.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
Till society improves the desired metrics, businesses and governments will continue to attempt to draw the best they can afford.
Did you forget the 2nd District Court ruling that screening for low IQ in police officers is not only common practice, it is protected by the court? That isn't screening for the best they can afford, it's screening for drones to operate the guns.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,325
Did you forget the 2nd District Court ruling that screening for low IQ in police officers is not only common practice, it is protected by the court? That isn't screening for the best they can afford, it's screening for drones to operate the guns.
Back to the low IQ rant again? Cops don't need a very high IQ when criminals are live streaming crimes using their real names. It's usually the higher IQ cops that have the pathological mindset for criminal behavior.
 

justtrying

Joined Mar 9, 2011
439
Back to the low IQ rant again? Cops don't need a very high IQ when criminals are live streaming crimes using their real names. It's usually the higher IQ cops that have the pathological mindset for criminal behavior.
Higher IQ set would not predispose one to behave as we are seeing i.e. to approach situation without assessment and critical thinking.

What we are not seeing is the following - if you are a professional, you will develop behavior and instincts that suit that profession very quickly. For example, how many people here have to think about turning live system off and completely removing power before working on it? It should not be a thought anymore, but something ingraned in your actions.

Hi IQ criminals are rarely violent offenders who go on shooting sprees...
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,325
Higher IQ set would not predispose one to behave as we are seeing i.e. to approach situation without assessment and critical thinking.

What we are not seeing is the following - if you are a professional, you will develop behavior and instincts that suit that profession very quickly. For example, how many people here have to think about turning live system off and completely removing power before working on it? It should not be a thought anymore, but something ingraned in your actions.

Hi IQ criminals are rarely violent offenders who go on shooting sprees...
I work on live high power systems all the time with the right equipment, that's a bad example.

It's not a predisposition, the smart bad cops seem to migrate to policing as a hunting ground for criminal behaviors. We are talking about higher IQ cops not criminals. I assume most of the worst police offenders do use assessment and critical thinking while some are just dumb crimes caused by a lack of anger management or mistakes in judgement.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,325
I'm going to tell the 2nd District Court you said they were ranting.:D
Yuck, yuck, yuck it's funny but irreverent to the problem of police thuggery. They don't because they are slow mentally. They do it because there is a system that lets them get away with criminal behaviors by using law enforcement as the cover.
 

justtrying

Joined Mar 9, 2011
439
I work on live high power systems all the time with the right equipment, that's a bad example.

It's not a predisposition, the smart bad cops seem to migrate to policing as a hunting ground for criminal behaviors. We are talking about higher IQ cops not criminals. I assume most of the worst police offenders do use assessment and critical thinking while some are just dumb crimes caused by a lack of anger management or mistakes in judgement.
It is not bad example, it is the first basics taught when working with voltage. If you do not develop this skill, things will go bad quickly. I also work with live equpment with proper precautions and this is where the thinking comes in - requires some IQ I think.
 

justtrying

Joined Mar 9, 2011
439
I got confused, are these high IQ cops criminals themselves due to their high IQ or are they good at catching pathological criminals because they can think the same way? Either scenario makes little sense to me... psycopaths tend to go into politics - can get more money and hurt more people, just look at the end of 2016
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
But seriously, Of the cops I have personally met, besides 90% of them making asses of themselves, more than half didn't know the law they were talking about.

Consider these statements police have said to me:

"The Sargent said motorcycles are dangerous so we're writing false traffic tickets to remove their drivers licenses."
(Did you ever read the bottom of the ticket where it says you signed it under penalty of perjury?)
(So I sold the motorcycle and didn't get another traffic in the next 42 years.)
"If I arrest him for creating a nuisance at 4 A.M. I will have to arrest you for trimming the tree that was scratching up your paint job, on your car, in your driveway."
(Four months later that a-hole neighbor completely cut down the tree that was allegedly too precious for me to trim the overhang.)
"You came to an agreement to sell him your truck but he didn't pay you any money for it? Sign over the title."
(So I signed over the title and never got paid for the truck.)
"You happened to witness a fist fight between two people you don't know from over 100 feet away? If I ever find you doing that again I'm going to put your name on my, "bad" list."
(So I moved to a different Sate and left him far behind me.)
"We suspect the pizza shop owner of child pornography so we're trying to ruin his business by arresting his customers."
(Four hours later I started my paper route, still in violation of "curfew", and no cops bothered me.)
"I retired after 20 years as a police officer and I still have never read The Constitution which I swore to defend."
(I just clamped my mouth shut and left the bank building.)

If you think IQ has nothing to do with beating or killing people for, "no crime happened", you have another think coming.
In my experience, they haven't beaten me or shot me, but their ignorance (caused by low IQ) regularly causes their unlawful behavior.
"Ignorance of The Law is no excuse (unless you are a LEO)."
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,325
But seriously, Of the cops I have personally met, besides 90% of them making asses of themselves, more than half didn't know the law they were talking about.
Maybe you or the environment you live in is just a magnet for cop “dumbasses”.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
Dangerous weapon? NSFW language.
The NYC police didn't steal his crutches because he was fighting. They stole them because he was homeless.
And they destroyed the crutches.
And the one legged man needed a hospital after the p0lice were done with him.
For, "No crime happened".
Unless you consider what the police did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top