Static electricity, it's all capacitance?

Discussion in 'Physics' started by AngryGecko, Nov 5, 2017.

  1. BR-549

    Distinguished Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    3,163
    776
    Time dilatation has not been proven. A environmental effected clock has been proven. Your clock changes with the environment.

    The vibration of a dipole is affected by the local environment/force fields. That is gravity and other accelerations. If you use charge frequency....not dipole frequency....gravity will have no effect. And if you turn the charge perpendicular to the direction of acceleration......the acceleration should have little....if any effect on rotational rate.

    All of your "time dilation" goes away.

    Even if we can not build a stable clock.......DOES NOT PROVE time dilation. It proves you can't build a stable clock.

    My proof is this discussion. I can give reasonable, physical, real causation for all phenomena.......while modern science is not even aware of, let alone can answer my simple fundamentals questions.

    Example.......all gravitational theories must show and explain an elliptical obit. But that orbit isn't there. So our theory proves something that doesn't exist. These are the proofs we get today. Do you believe they know what they are talking about when they explain an atom? Do you really believe that crap? They use math to prove non existent things all the time. You can mathematically prove everything and disprove everything when you vary constants at will. That's not science...it's fraud.

    Modern science gave up on physical science 100 years ago. And have been chasing a false math tale ever since to save reputations and funding.

    Math is 2D. And math is linear. Nature is 3D. Nature is angular. It's geometric. It provides balance.....to asymmetries.
     
  2. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    There is his proof in a nutshell.

    Another PSA...
     
  3. shortbus

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 30, 2009
    4,594
    2,631
    The thing I have a problem with is people saying, just because this is how things work on Earth, is the way physics are every where. We haven't been "everywhere" so it's all just theory or guessing that it is like that there.
     
  4. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    Why should earth have special physics? It seems like common sense (proven by experimental data from the most sensitive instruments we can build) they should be the same everywhere. All our predictions about gravity waves and other interstellar events from stars on the edge of the known universe agree with the theory that earth is not special and the laws of physics are the same everywhere. Copernicus said we are not special in 1543 so it's not a new idea.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17298.Simply_Einstein_Relativity_Demystified
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2017
    killivolt and xox like this.
  5. BR-549

    Distinguished Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    3,163
    776
    Earth has the most special physics in the universe......very unique. All of earth is a living system. The physics on the planet is like none other.

    All of the physics on this planet is entangled and controlled by life. Even the atmosphere and soil.

    Earth is a very special place.
     
  6. KL7AJ

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 4, 2008
    2,089
    343
    Actually, Tesla understood a great deal of physics and electromagnetics...it was all his latter-day groupies who warped his science beyond all recognition. They did the same thing to Ernst Lecher, who is undoubtedly spinning in his sarcophagus as a result. Look up Lecher Wire......and all the STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPIDSTUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID stuff all the new age wacko idiots are saying the Lecher wire can do. EEEESH.
     
  7. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    Sadly he seemed to only understand the physics of the 1890's, ignored the work of Maxwell and didn't revise this theories as our knowledge of electromagnetism increased.
    The IEEE said it best in their obit.
    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1694723/
    If his theory was at variance with the physics and electromagnetics of 1943 and today nothing has changed to that variance I would say he's mistaken on his theories.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  8. MrAl

    Distinguished Member

    Jun 17, 2014
    3,924
    839
    Hi,

    I dont think it is Earth itself i think it is the fact that this part of the universe could be 'special' and i put that in quotes because we have to define what special means in physics. For example, if you think the speed of light is special in our part of the universe you may be right due to at least one experiment that showed that it was different in another part of the universe. Now why this was i dont know, perhaps the space in that part of the universe is stretched more than around here, but for me i take the speed of light to be constant anywhere until more is done to look at this. But is 'special' really the speed of light is different or the space itself is a little different? That's why i think that 'special' has to be defined when we talk about this. Without dong that, everything can be called 'special' For example, it's special that we have dirt while the Sun has no dirt :)

    I usually keep to the same view as main steam science, but the question does come up as to what could be happening at distances very very far from us because we dont have any direct experience with distances so far off. We have absolutely NO timely experiment that is directly related to something more than about 90 astronomical units from our Sun (the termination shock point). Everything we see in the sky is often the way it existed far in the past. This brings up the question could things be a little different as we get farther out from the Sun.
    We do know from theory though that other Universes, if they really exist, can be very different from our own, so could there be a transition region. Two universes that are close to each other could have a transition region where our universe changes into the other universe and vice versa, where things could be a mixture. From what i have read, gravity still seems to apply even between universes somehow, and there is some speculation that this is why we see some unusual movements in one part of our universe way out there. If that is a place where this mixture occurs, that could be a very different place. Does this matter to us? Probably not right now, because we are so far from that place that we may never see that even as a civilization.

    To grasp the possibilities all we have to do is think back. Think back to the times when Man did not believe in so many things that we hold to be true today. Then one day someone proved it, then it became our reality. Until that time though we held on to the preconceived notions as a matter of convenience, not really as a matter of fact.
     
    shortbus likes this.
  9. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    My definition of 'special' is the same as yours. Is it possible, Sure but there just is no evidence for it. For us to be in a 'special' area of this universe that would mean there are Preferred_frame(s) of reference.

    Every experiment to see if Lorentz invariance (in electromagnetics) fails at even at the smallest and highest energy levels has shown Lorentz invariance to be correct and in exact accordance to SR.

    https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200606/lorentz.cfm



    There is always the possibility of something weird.
    http://nautil.us/issue/42/fakes/is-physical-law-an-alien-intelligence
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  10. MrAl

    Distinguished Member

    Jun 17, 2014
    3,924
    839
    Hi again,

    Yeah i always like to say that we cant imagine what is out there in it's entirety because we have not yet imagined what we need to imagine in order to set the proper framework for what we will be able to imagine after that. It's not a joke either, we really need to wait for some things as we have no other choice. Until then we do have some fascinating possibilities.

    There are some that believe that anything will be possible once we gain the proper insight. For example controlled star formation. They even class the level of intelligence based on what that civilization can achieve.

    One thing we know for sure, and that is like an amazing coincidence, that in this period of time we have the ability to examine our own fish tank, the one we ourselves live within, and try to determine where it came from and where we came from and what basic rules apply and so on. It's amazing that we can even think about this stuff.
     
  11. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    [QUOTE="MrAl, post: 1200104, member: 241810"

    One thing we know for sure, and that is like an amazing coincidence, that in this period of time we have the ability to examine our own fish tank, the one we ourselves live within, and try to determine where it came from and where we came from and what basic rules apply and so on. It's amazing that we can even think about this stuff.[/QUOTE]

    Just like lizards.
    [​IMG]
     
  12. shortbus

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 30, 2009
    4,594
    2,631
    Which goes back to what I said, about not ever being anywhere but here. Kind of like the old parable of, "the blind men and the elephant."
     
  13. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    3,775
    3,919
    Probable, possible?

    Due to random quantum fluctuations there is a negligible but non-zero chance that a 1968 pink convertible could materialize out of thin air in my driveway.
     
Loading...