Similar to free climbing shear rock walls a few thousand feet in the air.What a rush.
What an idiot!
One thing I noticed, is that he didn't hit the net exactly at its center... of course it might just be the camera angle.Imagine being asked to design the net for this trick.
I bet he had to ask a lot of engineers before one consented to take the job.
Maybe she was more upset that she wouldn't be collecting on an insurance policy.My wife said that his wife should've slapped the guy as soon as he was off the net!
Probably an insurance policy that included said clause would be more costly than your own life!Maybe she was more upset that she wouldn't be collecting on an insurance policy.
Most insurance policies specifically exclude "parachuting" and "skydiving" but those are synonyms according to most dictionaries. I don't think my policy has an exclusion for "jumping out of a perfectly good airplane without a plan to open a parachute".
Couldn't use a cat. They always land with their feet down.but I wonder how they tested it.
Yes, but breaking the glass in commercial, high-rise buildings and then getting people to jump are two big hurdles.I thought I heard not long ago that they're looking at using improved nets for fire rescue from tall buildings. It's relatively quick to set one up and a lot safer (for the first responders) than trying to send a team of firefighters up smoky stairwells to extract citizens.
I wonder if they would've have enough time to set it up... and then evacuate before the buildings fell ... I don't think it would've worked, of made too much difference.A net like that could have been handy about 15 years ago. Nothing sadder than seeing someone jumping out if the WTC.
by Aaron Carman
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz