Actually it was a real John Deere. 80's era 216. The MTD built stuff uses it, but not the same way.That pulley is commonly known as a "variator". It's a pretty common thing used in MTD lawn mowers. And even though you JD is badged as a JD it was probably made by MTD.
Quote, "Often a variator is a mechanical power transmission device that can change its gear ratio continuously (rather than in steps). " From - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variator
It didn't change. Got a little off topic with the CVT modifications, but everything is still inline with what I said in the OP. I don't blame you for not reading it, I know I can be long winded.@strantor This thread seems to have changed, I thought from the title, you wanted to govern the speed, now it seems you want to increase it?
i don't want to be a bad weather bird ... but the speed limit alone does not define "safe" ... 1 of the frist things in the martial arts school you are taught is fallingSo that my children and I can all drive it at speeds appropriate for our individual experience levels.
Right. And I'm not a parent who runs ahead of the children spraying disinfectant and making sure they wear their knee pads. I allow them to be exposed to manageable amounts of danger as I believe that is essential to learning how to deal with it. But there are limits. I don't let them handle firearms unsupervised or drive at highway speeds. I believe if danger could be quantified, we would find that it rises at some exponent of speed, so that is where my efforts are focused at the moment. Next will be improvements in handling and braking.i don't want to be a bad weather bird ... but the speed limit alone does not define "safe" ...
No worries. We went down the rabbit hole in together. If I had opposed, I would have resisted.Personally didn't mean to go off target myself about the variator setup... they are different, but share some common traits. In the end the springs and weights and such only make up a small portion of the puzzle while the amount of power to move the object at the desired speed actually dictates more of how it will act than anything.
i've been truly dead 16+ times , non of the recoveries from was sure in advance = you most always had to "work your guts out" to get or fool the sys. to "restore" . . . e.g. there is by default no any warranty of any kind you survive/resurrect . . . (( in other words "i was just too stupid to get i'm dead at the past" ))I allow them to be exposed to manageable amounts of danger as I believe that is essential to learning how to deal with it.
OK got you, but I have read it from the beginning.It didn't change. Got a little off topic with the CVT modifications, but everything is still inline with what I said in the OP. I don't blame you for not reading it, I know I can be long winded.
I want to make it faster AND be able to govern it. So that my children and I can all drive it at speeds appropriate for our individual experience levels.
I agree that limiting the movement of the CVT pulleys would be more predictable and exact speed governing method, however it would be like locking a car in 1st gear as the speed control. I can picture my daughter cruising around wide open throttle everywhere going only 10mph.OK got you, but I have read it from the beginning.
To control speed the easiest way without actually having the cart in front of me, I'd look at controling the movement of the driving pulley in the CVT. Something like a roller that would be moveable/adjustable for each driver. That would keep the speed in check much better than an engine governor.
The engine governor would work if the cart didn't use a CVT, but with the CVT as speed picks up the engine speed doesn't have to be as fast. It is like an automatic transmission in a car, it takes lower RPM at 50MPH than it does to go 25MPH, because the gearing is different at both speeds.
You mean like people that mow grass with a riding lawn mower? Small engines are made to run at a set speed, four strokers are ~3600RPM, the engines governor keeps it there, so unless you disable the governor it's not going to hurt the engine. But without the engine governor, yes, it could be a problem.I can picture my daughter cruising around wide open throttle everywhere going only 10mph.
Yes, like people on lawn mowers. But I'm not trying to emulate a lawn mower.You mean like people that mow grass with a riding lawn mower? Small engines are made to run at a set speed, four strokers are ~3600RPM, the engines governor keeps it there, so unless you disable the governor it's not going to hurt the engine. But without the engine governor, yes, it could be a problem.
Unless the CVT is restrained from changing past a certain point of movement the speed will increase even at a certain engine speed. Unless it is going up a grade. As the force needed to overcome ground friction decreases speed will increase. Did you ever ride or have a Honda Trail 90 type of bike? They had a CVT and that's what happens when riding them.
I am planning to do some work to the engine down the road, after the suspension, steering, and braking are up to snuff. Among those engine modifications will be removal of the governor. This engine is sold as a 22HP engine but with the right modifications it can make 60-70HP. I don't think I need that much, but a doubling of factory HP is a goal.For no good reason (just because I want to), I am slowly turning it into something more like a car.
I was just going to see what you think about this, but guessing you've already found it.I am planning to do some work to the engine down the road, after the suspension, steering, and braking are up to snuff. Among those engine modifications will be removal of the governor. This engine is sold as a 22HP engine but with the right modifications it can make 60-70HP. I don't think I need that much, but a doubling of factory HP is a goal.
What happens when you let off the throttle? It slows down doesn't it? Unless I misread something lately I thought that is where this project was going.Unless the CVT is restrained from changing past a certain point of movement the speed will increase even at a certain engine speed. Unless it is going up a grade. As the force needed to overcome ground friction decreases speed will increase. Did you ever ride or have a Honda Trail 90 type of bike? They had a CVT and that's what happens when riding them.
Yes I've spent more time on that guy's channel than I can justify. I really should grow up. But I would rather race go carts against my manchild friends.I was just going to see what you think about this, but guessing you've already found it.
Yes it slows down. But if the throttle is kept steady it will slowly speed up the vehicle when a CVT/torque convertor drive is used, on level flat ground. This thread is so far off the original idea I have no idea where it's going.What happens when you let off the throttle? It slows down doesn't it? Unless I misread something lately I thought that is where this project was going.
Yes, it slows down. That's what my governor will do: let off the throttle. Hopefully it will let off the throttle at a controlled rate in response to rate of acceleration, resulting in a smooth settling in at the set point max speed, rather than an abrupt "wall" or even worse, jerky "hunting" around above and below the max.What happens when you let off the throttle? It slows down doesn't it? Unless I misread something lately I thought that is where this project was going.
This isn't the first you've said so and it looks like you're getting some nodding heads, so I must have not stated the original idea as clearly as I thought. To me, the conversation is still 100% on topic and hasn't wandered anywhere except a brief sidebar about CVT modifications. What is your interpretation of the original idea and how is the current conversation divergent?This thread is so far off the original idea I have no idea where it's going.
That you wanted to control the speed of the cart/utv. Then you didn't want to run it like a "lawn mower', full throttle on the governed engine speed. If the drive pulley isn't restrained to a certain point, the speed won't be slowed down to a certain point. The newer CVT's may be different, I'm used to the older ones, that as the ground speed gets easier to do the drive pulley will continue to close up making it go faster. This happens because the driven pulley is "back driving" the drive pulley, allowing it to open up more lowering the 'gear' ratio.What is your interpretation of the original idea and how is the current conversation divergent?
Thanks for those links. They were better than most I have been able to find.That you wanted to control the speed of the cart/utv. Then you didn't want to run it like a "lawn mower', full throttle on the governed engine speed. If the drive pulley isn't restrained to a certain point, the speed won't be slowed down to a certain point. The newer CVT's may be different, I'm used to the older ones, that as the ground speed gets easier to do the drive pulley will continue to close up making it go faster. This happens because the driven pulley is "back driving" the drive pulley, allowing it to open up more lowering the 'gear' ratio.
Most every one these I've worked with has to have a certain engine speed to start to engage the drive, if you adjust springs and weights to get engagement at a lower speed you will end up losing top end speed with the full engine RPM.
https://amsnow.com/how-to-tech/2013/11/the-evolution-of-clutching-and-the-cvt
https://bikemanperformance.com/tech-tips/general-clutching.html
https://aftermarketassassins.com/tech-blog/f/clutching-holy-grail
http://www.sledgear.com/driventech.htm
https://www.snowtechmagazine.com/ideal-clutch-tuning/
While some will say those links are for snowmobiles(what I worked with) they were where the possibility of ATV/UTV started, the CVT/torque drive the snowmobile used .