Pretty inconvenient. But we could find you another...I sent the ebay seller of the waveteck the above image. His reply is: "
would you like to send back we tested it and it was working?
Pretty inconvenient. But we could find you another...I sent the ebay seller of the waveteck the above image. His reply is: "
would you like to send back we tested it and it was working?
I wrote this seller and asked if he would pay return shipping if the unit did not operate properly.
These instruments are going to be more stable and offer more functionality then older instruments of the same class or cheap newer ones. They are professional tools and will do anything you might need in a repeatable, accurate fashion.I wrote this seller and asked if he would pay return shipping if the unit did not operate properly.
What makes this unit and the Wavetek FG3B, that you also suggested, superior to the other units I looked at?
I assume they are newer and digital? I could see you were going for digital oscilliscopes vs the analog but I
am missing what you see in the FG that I don't.
Thank you for you response Yaakov. I assumed you were trying to get me into tools that are quality vs junk and I am glad to have that guidance. I have no desire to use inferior equipment and hope to figure out what is suitable on my own. Failing that, I am perfectly happy to follow advice that gets me good tools until I can do it myself. (which seems some distance off yet!)Many times when I embark on a new technical pursuit I buy something because I don't know what's good and I try to hedge my bets on cost-benefit. Nearly invariably it isn't long before I am looking to buy what I should have done in the first place, and the original purchase is written off as "the cost of learning".
No one in industry or academia ever used the cheap gear you were looking at, but that GW might even have an asset tag on it from a lab somewhere.
My experience is that at first, things are very disconnected, it's just a jumble of apparently separate and seemingly arbitrary things but each time you learn why something works and linked it to what it looks like, is called, is located, &c. you get a little more integration of the pieces.Thank you for you response Yaakov. I assumed you were trying to get me into tools that are quality vs junk and I am glad to have that guidance. I have no desire to use inferior equipment and hope to figure out what is suitable on my own. Failing that, I am perfectly happy to follow advice that gets me good tools until I can do it myself. (which seems some distance off yet!)![]()
I think a 2GHz generator is slightly above the audio frequency range.I found another place to look but they seem to be priced above my pay grade.
https://www.trsrentelco.com/special...ed-equipment?productsperpage=100&category=305
B&K is decent kit. I am sure it would work well for you.lol Yaakov, I kinda thought that it was a bit much for my needs.
BUT, How about this:
https://www.amazon.com/Precision-40...Z9SC/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8&th=1