Need help in Aptitude Question

Via the the stipulation that R1 ≤ R2 and the implicit lower limit of R1 = 0 (owing to the fact that it is a resistor)

So:
Req=(0*R2)/(0+R2) Indeed yields a lower limit of 0 for Req

So... what's the upper limit or Req?
 
That is merely an arbitrary guess and it is not a symbolic expression!:rolleyes:

---Consider this ---

We've already decided the lower limit = 0

Given that:
Req=(R1*R2)/(R1+R2)

And that

R1 ≤ R2

And that:

R1 ≥ 0 (owing to the definition of [dissipative] resistors) (Granted a 0Ω 'resistor' is not dissipative -- but 'what the hey';))

we may state the lower limit of Req algebraically thus:

Req(Minimum)=(0*R2)/(0+R2) ------- Get it?

Now express the upper limit in similar manner:)
 

Thread Starter

RRITESH KAKKAR

Joined Jun 29, 2010
2,829
A board 50 inches long is to be divided into four parts. Each part is to be 1 inch longer than the next part. What will be the lengths of the four pieces?
let the length of smaller be x.
so total length of 3 part will be 50-x
------------------------------50inch
x | | | (50-x)
 

Thread Starter

RRITESH KAKKAR

Joined Jun 29, 2010
2,829
A board 50 inches long is to be divided into four parts. Each part is to be 1 inch longer than the next part. What will be the lengths of the four pieces?

ok, 44 3 2 1

no
 
Top