MrAl, I had some questions very specifically about modifying power output on a microwave. I read a previous post of yours and it seems that you were able to achieve a nonpulse uniform energy drop, which is actually exactly what I am curious about. I am incredibly new to forum settings, but I would very much appreciate some guidance on the subject.Hello,
Are we still trying to find the energy lost in the wire?
For two batteries connected together so that one charges the other, if we consider the voltages to be constant (which they arent as anyone who works with batteries on a daily basis knows) then we have a simple circuit with two voltage sources V1 and V2 where V1 is higher than V2 so we have a different voltage:
Vd=V1-V2
and if the resistance is say 2 ohms, we have current:
i=Vd/2
or just power:
P=Vd^2/2
The energy is then:
W=T*Vd^2/2
where T is the time to charge.
So it is a little simpler than the caps. It's a little different because we are stopping the charge independent of the voltages.
Now the better example i think would be to have one battery slightly higher voltage than the other, and allow the voltage to change as the both pass current. I havent done that yet though.
Interestingly, i think the circuit then would look like two capacitors with offset voltages not part of the real battery, and the two caps exchange energy as the voltages change slightly over time. Once the two voltages are the same, we're done.
[LATER]
Ok it looks the same. The voltage of the one cap comes up to 100.4975 as before.
The intuition about this might be that the offset voltages act the same as the initial condition generator sources, so they appear in the same place as those.
But also, the loss is based on the differential voltage not the absolute voltages.
The circuit was such that one battery was smaller than the other and the smaller charging the larger and allowed to go down in voltage also.
Now if we try to maintain voltages to nearly the same, then we go back to the constant voltages model.
Thank you, N