There was a young fellow named FiskOf course the length of length stays the same and the passage of time remains consistent for anyone experiencing acceleration (or in a gravity well)
It is called relativity because it is all relative to what an OUTSIDER would observe.
If you travel close to the speed of light time passes slower for you
(This experiment has been done several times and conforms to the theory exactly), but YOU can't tell it goes slower. It is only slower RELATIVE to the time rate of the outside observer. For you nothing changes.
Not quite.If you accelerate at the rate of 32 ft/sec/sec, would you not achieve a velocity of the speed of light in a little less than a year?
The problem with your reasoning is that you want to apply what is observed in one frame directly to what would be observed in another frame, which is how we would do it in Newtonian physics. To see this more obviously, use 0.9c instead of 0.5c. Now you would have to claim that the particles see their relative velocities as 1.8c, which we know is not possible in relativistic physics.Since velocity is relative, how does it work out when two particles with mass are traveling in opposite directions at .5c relative a 3rd party observer? Relaive the observer each particle is going .5c, but relative each other the particles should be traveling at c. But do the particles not see their velocity relative each other as c due to their own shift in time, which is also relative each other?
Then please explain, in a mathematically rigorous way, at least one of the hundreds of experimentally observed phenomena that relativistic physics has not only explained, but has predicted and subsequently been verified.That is so lame. The length of length does not change. The rate of time does not change.
The frequency of a dipole changes in a electric field gradient or a magnetic field gradient. All of your machines and all of your measuring tools use dipoles.
A gravity gradient can change the frequency of a dipole also. Accelerating a "mass" can change dipole frequency. In other words.....just changing direction, can change dipole frequency.
There is no mystery or magic here. Time and length do not change. Nature is very firm.
I remember it with the third and fourth lines in the reverse order.There once was a lady named bright,
who could travel faster than light.
In a relative way,
she left one day,
returning the previous night.
More babble. Time dilation has been measured many times. The GPS - and many other systems -- only attain the accuracy they do because relativistic effects are taken into account.Have you ever seen a "beta" particle in a cloud chamber? Does anybody think that, that is a wave function?
Modern science denies and ignores mass. They do this by mathy equating mass to energy. Then they convolute energy. You can use energy to measure mass...........but mass is stationary momentum.
What does an electron look like? Is it just a fuzzy area wave function? That was a speck of something in that chamber. What was it?
Was it a quantum state that made that track thru a sea of matter? Did it carry or possess and conserve information?
Can hawking account for all his data? Nature does not need nor use information. Information is a man made concept. And nothing more.
Nature is force and reaction to it. It's simple and elegant. And science can't see it.
An atom is a series dipole circuit. Larger atoms have series and parallel dipole circuits. These circuits are effected by and interact with the environment. These circuits are self powered, but can accept, store and transfer power to other circuits.
I know it's hard for you to believe, but the components that make these circuits have characteristics that are not effected by the environment. If you were to use this for a clock reference.....you would see that time is constant.
Time is constant everywhere. That's why everything works the same way everywhere.
If time can be varied........why don't we see various light speeds?
Time dilation is truly crackpot science. Get an accurate clock.
There is a crackpot in this discussion but it's not the science.Time dilation is truly crackpot science.
Don't just spout it and claim that it is so because you want it to be so.Take a seat in a very fast car. Now put your hands in your lap and twiddle your thumbs. Have the driver accelerate to 100 mph in 4 sec.
Did your twiddle rate stay constant? Did the acceleration force interfere with your twiddle rate....or did the rate of time change?
You can feel acceleration. Dipoles feel it too. If you are preforming a function (such as a clock)..........the acceleration will effect that function. You don't need to accelerate either. Just position in a gradient can effect dipoles.
The disagreement between your clocks is normal. It is neither a mystery nor magic.
If you use an electron for a clock...........all those problems go away. Even if the electron changes energy level.....you still have the constant universal time rate.
And that rate can not be changed.
Eventhough everyone on earth will see the astronaut's rocket shrink, at least he gets to think it is still full sized.The time is not the only thing that changes near light speed.
Everything grows shorter in the direction of travel. The rocket ship which was 100 feet long on earth would be much shorter near light speed, but an astronaut could measure it in flight and would not discern any changes because the measuring instruments would have contracted by the same amount.
And yet an uncertainty of one second in 30 million years is relatively easy to obtain.Our clocks are based on dipole or atomic vibrations. This is a terrible idea.
OK, but what's the frequency of an electron?If we used the frequency of an electron for a clock, we could keep perfect synced time everywhere.
So say you, but what is that common time?Then you would see time (and length) does not change. All electrons in the universe have a common time.
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Duane Benson
by Jake Hertz