Here are two variations of a current booster circuit for an LM317 regulator. Note that all filter/compensation/transient capacitors are intentionally deleted for clarity.
A: In another thread I proposed a current booster circuit for an LM317 that is different from the standard circuit on the datasheet. Mine uses an NPN power transistor outside the 317 feedback loop. Advantages are that NPN power transistors are cheaper and better performing than their PNP "counterparts", there is no PNP driver needed as with a Sziklai pair, etc. Disadvantages are increased headroom, and the NPN power emitter follower is outside the 317 control loop so the output will sag a little bit as the output current increases due to increasing Vbe. For the application in that thread it is quick and dirty and meets all of the requirements. Thinking about the output sag led to B.
B: This circuit has the emitter follower inside the 317 control loop. In theory this circuit should compensate for the existence of and changes in Vbe. I have not searched the innergoogle to see if anyone has thought of this already.
So have at it: Is there any reason circuit B will not work, or will be only marginally stable, or or or.
Thanks.
ak

A: In another thread I proposed a current booster circuit for an LM317 that is different from the standard circuit on the datasheet. Mine uses an NPN power transistor outside the 317 feedback loop. Advantages are that NPN power transistors are cheaper and better performing than their PNP "counterparts", there is no PNP driver needed as with a Sziklai pair, etc. Disadvantages are increased headroom, and the NPN power emitter follower is outside the 317 control loop so the output will sag a little bit as the output current increases due to increasing Vbe. For the application in that thread it is quick and dirty and meets all of the requirements. Thinking about the output sag led to B.
B: This circuit has the emitter follower inside the 317 control loop. In theory this circuit should compensate for the existence of and changes in Vbe. I have not searched the innergoogle to see if anyone has thought of this already.
So have at it: Is there any reason circuit B will not work, or will be only marginally stable, or or or.
Thanks.
ak
