Nope. Already cleared S. America and is currently over the Atlantic at about 138km.?? I think Chile is the current projection.
http://www.aerospace.org/CORDSuploads/TiangongStoryboard.png
Does that really matter? Isn't the orbital period for something that low somewhere in the 90 minute range? Doesn't that mean that the current uncertainty (last I see) of ±1.7 hrs means that it could come down anywhere along the track of more than a complete orbit either sooner or later than the best guess point?Nope. Already cleared S. America and is currently over the Atlantic at about 138km.
Cross posted with your edit.Nope. Already cleared S. America and is currently over the Atlantic at about 138km.
Edit: Sorry, I'm reading this all wrong. There is at least one more orbit to go. S. America is still in the window.
Yup, good movie.Just watched "Hidden Figures" last night, very good movie for those who haven't seen it. Introduction to NASA's first use of the IBM Computer. Plus, the insight of just how far we had to push to get a rocket into space and have it come down where we wanted it for recovery.
This thread just reminded me of how difficult it can be to know where something will or will not land eventually.
kv
I do not mind as long one debris hits precisely that dog barking every night at around 03.00, right here, across the street.Sorry, I'm reading this all wrong. There is at least one more orbit to go. S. America is still in the window.
I saw this as well. Is there any reason to believe the object was traversing a perfectly circular orbit, or one that was monotonically declining in altitude?Did anyone notice the height increased 2.5 km as it approached Asia.
I'm surprised it hasn't gained more attention in the media.I saw this as well. Is there any reason to believe the object was traversing a perfectly circular orbit, or one that was monotonically declining in altitude?
Perhaps the orbit was elliptical, with the majority of early breaking occurring at perigee?
Good movie. Was a bit disappointed with some of the liberties they took to make things seem worse than they were, but most of those I'm willing to grant as reasonably legitimate poetic license in order to include relevant events within a coherent context given the limited time/space span of the movie.Just watched "Hidden Figures" last night, very good movie for those who haven't seen it. Introduction to NASA's first use of the IBM Computer. Plus, the insight of just how far we had to push to get a rocket into space and have it come down where we wanted it for recovery.
This thread just reminded me of how difficult it can be to know where something will or will not land eventually.
kv