chinmoy1955
- Joined Oct 15, 2017
- 1
1. "Slow (manual)" - Well, speed does not seem a deterrent here. If the aim is to produce a replica of a vintage PCB, it may well take a long time to design the layout, what is more important is that the product is a replica. "Time" here is a one time investment.There is a reason nobody designs PCBs that way any more (even if cost of labor was not considered). so, for the moment, i cannot think of any advantage of designing boards using that approach:
- slow (manual)
- no design rules check
- no vias (and no multilayers)
- no solder mask,
etc.
2. "no design rules check" - The kind of PCB we are looking at here, i.e.. audio with signal frequencies not exceeding 20kHz, design rules checking is a luxury. Track densities is no where near that of a modern computer motherboard having track widths of 0.1 mm spaced 0.05 mm apart, so in present case, DRC can be done with the naked eyes! I have designed hundreds of (audio) PCB's manually and never faced any DRC problems.
3. "no vias (and no multilayers)" - A simple audio amp PCB does not require vias or multilayer boards. I agree it is much easier to design a multi layered PCB, but at the same time the fabrication of multi layered boards is more expensive and the end product is costlier.
4. " no solder mask" - Wrong. Solder masks can be placed on any type of boards, whether manually designed or computer designed.
In conclusion, I would say this is a special requirement and justifies special treatment, a little more time spent in designing a vintage PCB should not be an issue at all.