Reaction time, remember this solution measures period, then in next period
the output pulse reflects the previous periods measurement and calculation.
So latency is one period of incoming pulse. But as you can see it starts with
very small delay from start of second incoming pulse + edge.


Yes to automotive -

http://www.cypress.com/documentatio...200-family-datasheet-programmable-system-chip

http://www.cypress.com/documentatio...000-family-datasheet-programmable-system-chip

http://www.cypress.com/file/209746/download

You need to contact them direct for current status of parts, sales office, FAE....
Ask them about PSOC 4M family, and any otehr families to focus on. 4M has
more UDB and DMA, still low cost family.

Looks like they are focused on PSOC 4 family for PSOC automotive.

Yes to Analog



Regards, Dana.

 

I'll certainly study this PSOC's. Thanks for yr efforts!

 

Here's a circuit which should do the job. Latency is the same as the pulse gap, i.e. 1ms. Replace R5 with a 100k pot if you want the gap to be adjustable.
View attachment 154178
V1 is the input pulse source. R1,D1 protect the circuit from excessive input pulse amplitude (given the automotive application). U1a just squares up the input pulses. Latch U1b gets set by the input pulse and reset 1ms later. R5,C3 set the pulse gap width. A regulated supply (e.g. 9V) is recommended for the circuit.
Attached is the LTspice simulation .asc file if anyone wants to play.
View attachment 154180

Hello, I have been looking at yr input. I cannot see how you realise a result as stated in post #20.

 

Can be done with logical elements, but I am not curtain of the accuracy.