Buck regulators are Switch-Mode Power Supplies. Are you asking how to do this using a Linear (non-SMPS) regulator?I would like to rephrase it by saying not smps but regulators that are not linear like buck regulators. ...
Look at the subject line. OP needs a step down not step up.DC-DC STEP UP BOOST CONVERTER 150W 10-32V INPUT TO 12-35V OUTPUT
Moderators note: reduced font size as large fonts are like shouting
Statement is redundant. Buck==step down, boost==step up. A switching regulator can be configured for either.spinnaker said:Look for a step down buck regulator module.
Statement is redundant. Buck==step down, boost==step up. A switching regulator can be configured for either.
There are various incarnations of buck-boost regulators, and a small selection of off the shelf chips for that job - but the design isn't trivial, I generally design with the 2 functions separate - that is for example a brute force boost, followed by a buck with whatever regulation I need.Thanks Mr Detail.. As far as I am aware those modules cannot be configured for either. They are either step up or step down. And the LM2596 is only a step down chip.
If you're going to use electronics speak, you might as well save yourself some embarrassment and try to use the terminology correctly.Thanks Mr Detail.
Simple 3 terminal linear regulators can be converted to buck/boost with the addition of a handful of components.As far as I am aware those modules cannot be configured for either. They are either step up or step down. And the LM2596 is only a step down chip.
One thing no one mentioned yet:If you're going to use electronics speak, you might as well save yourself some embarrassment and try to use the terminology correctly.
Simple 3 terminal linear regulators can be converted to buck/boost with the addition of a handful of components.
View attachment 97248
It wasn't convenient to breadboard an example, so I simulated the above circuit in LTspice. It sucked at simulating this and was really picky about the R2/R3 divider (and the value of R1), but I know from experience that it works and the values aren't really that critical. With R4=0, it's a buck regulator; otherwise, with an appropriate ratio, it's a boost regulator.
A switching regulator IC marketed as buck only should work in boost mode if it gives you access to it's feedback terminal. MC34063A can be configured as buck or boost.
If you're going to use electronics speak, you might as well save yourself some embarrassment and try to use the terminology correctly.
Simple 3 terminal linear regulators can be converted to buck/boost with the addition of a handful of components.
View attachment 97248
It wasn't convenient to breadboard an example, so I simulated the above circuit in LTspice. It sucked at simulating this and was really picky about the R2/R3 divider (and the value of R1), but I know from experience that it works and the values aren't really that critical. With R4=0, it's a buck regulator; otherwise, with an appropriate ratio, it's a boost regulator.
A switching regulator IC marketed as buck only should work in boost mode if it gives you access to it's feedback terminal. MC34063A can be configured as buck or boost.
One thing no one mentioned yet:
A buck regulator puts the control transistor in series with the load, so if it fails short circuit it dumps the full unregulated voltage downstream and can cause damage.
This was a problem with multisync VGA monitors, the buck regulator sometimes failed and caused a lot of damage in the horizontal scan section. The manufacturers became aware of this and started using low voltage main SMPSU of about 60V and using a boost converter to step it up. If the transistor fails in a flyback converter, it shorts out the supply and the main SMPSU went into over current shutdown. All this happened about the time CRTs were going out of fashion, so it was pretty much game over by then.
There's 2 easy ways to protect the load - first is use a buck to step down to less than the required voltage then boost it back up with a flyback. Or just go for the basic buck and protect the load with a crowbar SCR.
A positive to negative converter is often designated "inverter" in this context - they're more in keeping with the flyback topology, and AFAIK: short the unregulated supply if the transistor fails.Interesting. What about more sophisticated bucks like the LM2675? It does say this in the datasheet:
Positive-to-Negative Converter for full protection under fault conditions.
Not sure if that means a full failure.
I don´t see how it could become a boost when it has buck topology.With R4=0, it's a buck regulator; otherwise, with an appropriate ratio, it's a boost regulator.
Never mind - there's time to learn..................I don´t see how it could become a boost when it has buck topology.