Hi,You mentioned possibly buying a commercial product to do this. This is not a universe I'm familiar with; can you post a link to something typical? Just curious.
ak
Hi,Wiring.
Compared to soldering connecting wires directly to the circuit boards, connectors are time-consuming and expensive. But they pay it back very quickly if you have to remove a board from the system for, well, just about anything. I always recommend them, but I recognize that it is a financial decision, sometimes more than technical.
I would use 0.1" pitch headers for all I/O - switches, LEDs, sensors, power - because I have the parts and the crimp tool. The modules you linked to all have field wiring / terminal blocks. If that is what you want, then consider a compromise - terminals blocks that plug onto a pin header. At least for the development / debugging phase, they save tons of time. If you have a favorite connector (or connector style), please post a link or photo.
ak
When you get a moment, i would like to use the circuit you designed for me for a different kind of signal to be used on certain sections of track where it would not be practical to use 2 Sensors. I have enclosed a Flow chart for your information.Hi,
I am using MB-102 Bread board for prototype and in tend to use D-Sub connectors for connection to the structure & signals.
Allison
HiI will be building a prototype this weekend (time permitting, hubby is home this weekend !!)... I will then be building the physical signals after i have finished wiring the control panels (1st panel front & wiring pic is enclosed), i am in the midle of wiring the 2nd panel.
I have enclosed a pic of the 2nd Panel and the layout schematic just to give you a flavour of the work i am doing,
Allison
View attachment 208958View attachment 208959
Hi,Hi
Nice panel.
I used to design RR traffic control systems for passenger and freight trains (In the US) in my former life.
a few were the largest in the country at the time. Is this a model layout? What gauge? From the discussion, it seems this is similar to the old “line o lite” style traffic control systems. Just curious.,
Morning Eric,hi Allison,
Update on the 4093 circuit when using TCRT5000 Sensor modules.
As per your PM test, the TCRT have been disconnected so that you can test the Manual switches, looks OK.
Let me know when the Manual test is working OK, will then try S1 and S2 inputs.
E
Footnote:
The TCRT sensor output is High when activated ie: inverted compared to the original IR sensor, which gave you unusable results.
Cap C2 is used to enable a Latch Reset at Power On
The components inside the boxed dashed line area are the SIM of the TCRT.
View attachment 210021
Hi,In a PM, I raised the idea of modifying the IR module to run on 12 V and eliminating the 7805 regulator, and she asked for the details. I've been wrestling with some computer issues, but here is a first pass at a combined assembly that uses a bare TCRT5000 instead of a pc board assembly. Since we know what they are driving, changing to an LM358 eliminates two pull up resistors.
I saw the complete mudules online for around $1, including shipping. There is no way that replicating the modules will cost less; its all about the build.
ak
View attachment 210064
Hi,Follow up question: where are the two trigger manual switches (SWX) located - near the IR sensors, near the control board, or somewhere else?
ak
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Aaron Carman