NOTE:
ALL the TS's posts, in this Thread, have been Reverted back to their original text and format.

Moderation.

Just curious, what does that mean?

 

This is why we need to discuss EM waves in my estimation. They contain the conserved independent parts, which is the meat and potatoes of this analysis.

There is no difference between EM and mechanical waves in this regard. The "losing of group metadata" happens with EM waves, too. FM radio is an EM wave; to keep the channels separable, they are partitioned into distinct bandwidths (which we tune to with our FM receivers).

Spepsi, as a mechanical wave or an EM wave, is non-separable.

 

Just curious, what does that mean?

It means other than fixing grammar the staff will not allow you to change what you posted after the fact.

 

All can say is

that if you followed the maths, they prove that there is absolutely no oxymoron in the system,

No, you are wrong on this, my friend. Math and physics are two different things, as Bogosort pointed out. The math is a mental model and shows symbolic connections in the mind space only.

We already heard this from you multiple times, and we really don’t need to again, so please kindly refrain from spreading falsehoods here.

 

There is no difference between EM and mechanical waves in this regard. The "losing of group metadata" happens with EM waves, too. FM radio is an EM wave; to keep the channels separable, they are partitioned into distinct bandwidths (which we tune to with our FM receivers).

Spepsi, as a mechanical wave or an EM wave, is non-separable.

But Pepsi and Sprite appear as separate waves concurrently in an analysis of the Spepsi EM wave, correct?

If Spepsi were digitized after emitting from an audiospeaker, and then converted back to EM, would the spectrometer show the partitioned modulations?

 

Thread Temporarily Closed pending Moderation.