Save the EMF money for a 'Button'. If it feels good - push it.

 

This is the problem... the polar bears are not dying. In fact, there are more polar bears around today than there were in 1978. When a "scientist" says that he saw a polar bear 20 miles out to sea and concludes that the bear's ice had melted under him and thus "evidence" of global warming, it just shows his ignorance. A polar bear has been known to swim 60 miles with no problem in pursuit of his prey. This is the problem with a lot of the "research" on radiation results from cell phones (and I'm talking about honest research, not outright fraudulent research - which is what a lot of the research on EM from cellphones is), which is mis-interpreting the data and assuming correlation implies causality (which it does not).

So I am supposed to trust you some random guy on the internet rather than a working professional who is physically going to the Artic on a regular basis who says the polar bears are dying. Huh again who is being un-scientific NOW!

https://paulnicklen.com/stills/polar-bears/#!jig[1]/ML/2262

This is allot of bubble talk to me complete unwillingness to stay open minded and not listening to the lived reality of others. I don't let the first thing that comes in my mind become my reality but you can also deny reality. I am exiting this conversation now because it is not benefiting my time.

 

So I am supposed to trust you some random guy on the internet rather than a working professional who is physically going to the Artic on a regular basis who says the polar bears are dying. Huh again who is being un-scientific NOW!

https://paulnicklen.com/stills/polar-bears/#!jig[1]/ML/2262

This is allot of bubble talk to me complete unwillingness to stay open minded and not listening to the lived reality of others. I don't let the first thing that comes in my mind become my reality but you can also deny reality. I am exiting this conversation now because it is not benefiting my time.

No, I'm not expecting you to trust some random guy, I'm expecting you to do your OWN internet searches to research the facts you want. Of course, to do this, you have to put your BS filter on "high detect" in order to wade through all the misspeak and propaganda. After wading through the BS, you should be able to conclude (as a minimum): The population of polar bears is much higher than it was in the 1960's, thus the polar bears are not "dying".

But to make such a conclusion, you'll have to put on your big boy clothes and leave your mother's basement, something you probably haven't done since you graduated high school five years ago (you're still wearing your Star Wars pajamas, correct?).

Just plug "polar bear population" in your favorite, non-tracking search engine and go. Here's an excerpt from one book in that search:

POLAR BEAR POPULATIONS BOOMING
Liberals apparently chose the polar bear as a poster child for global warming because the bears are considered cute, although no one who had a close encounter with a polar bear would describe it that way. Why global warming would be harmful to polar bears was never persuasively explained, nor was there any explanation of how the bears had survived many climatic changes over hundreds of thousands of years. In any event, it’s time to call the whole thing off. Polar bears are thriving:

Polar bear numbers could easily exceed 40,000, up from a low point of 10,000 or fewer in the 1960s.

In The Polar Bear Catastrophe that Never Happened, a book published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Dr Susan Crockford uses the latest data as well as revisiting some of the absurd values used in official estimates, and concludes that polar bears are actually thriving:

My scientific estimates make perfect sense and they tally with what the Inuit and other Arctic residents are seeing on the ground. Almost everywhere polar bears come into contact with people, they are much more common than they used to be. It’s a wonderful conservation success story.

Of course, success stories are the last things liberals want to hear, unless they relate to Cuba or Venezuela. Dr. Crockford, like others who blow the whistle on liberal hoaxes, has been viciously smeared.

 

Hey guys: What does polar bears have to do with EMF Hoodies? And can we keep a civil attitude please? No need to fight over differences of opinions.

In 1978, there were 5,000 polar bears. Today, there are only 25,000 left.

Interesting. In 40 years the polar bear population has not doubled, not tripled, not quadrupled, but has expanded five times their numbers. WOW! That's exceptionally hard to believe. Not saying it isn't so, but for 5000 bears to become 25000, well, a polar bears life for me - for sure! (Just My Opinion).

 

Hey guys: What does polar bears have to do with EMF Hoodies?

It's totally related by 6 degrees of separation.

Like minds tend to cluster. EMF 'sensitives' and Climate change 'skeptics' are much alike.

 

@nsaspook So what you're saying is that a polar bear in the arctic circle is related within just six degrees of separation to my shirt button? Well, maybe so. I think buttons at one time were made from marine mammal bone (whale most likely). So a particular polar bear might now a seal who might know a sea otter, who may know a sturgeon who may know a crab who may know a whale.

Interesting.

Actually all kidding aside, I did enjoy the video. Kind of scary to know I'm connected by no more than six degrees of separation to the Great Pumpkin.