Thanks for that!The Oft Repeated Cautions are for beginners who don't understand why they need an isolation transformer, not seasoned pros...
FWIW - We generally prefer high power dividers (of the general form pictured below) to 'probes' as applied to DC/Low frequency EHT measurement/analysis (to Ca. 500kV) -- It has been my sad experience that probes, no matter how (ostensibly) 'high quality' are treacherous at EHT -- and there is little more disruptive of a project than awaiting shipment of replacement test gearThese were like 20 kV rated back in 1974 and 1983 ... when I've used them.
could do 40 kV 100 mS pulse according to datasheet.
Are you certain about what you say regarding her instruments? As far as I know, only one manufacturer makes mixed domain oscilloscopes, namely Tektronix (the MDO3000 and MDO4000 series). According to the user manuals, none of the instruments can be battery operated, nor do they have isolation between the input channels and the various networking protocols.While I ignore the identity/details of the specific instrument/procedures employed, I can say that several (if not all) of her instruments of that 'caste' (i.e. MDOs) are (optionally) operable from self-contained (i.e. on-board battery powered) PSUs and exhibit guaranteed input-channel to case/control insulation of > 750V DC/Line freq AC...
I very much doubt it!Could it be that Aleph used MDO as an abbreviation for something else?
Granting that 'MDO' may indeed be a Tektronix 'trademark' -- To be certain, said 'designation' enjoys longtime adoption as a 'form taxonomy'As far as I know, only one manufacturer makes mixed domain oscilloscopes, namely Tektronix (the MDO3000 and MDO4000 series)
But then I seem to recall availability of said option at the time I ordered @Jazz2C's replacement MDO3104According to the user manuals, none of the instruments can be battery operated
The 'isolation' is between the input channels and the external surfaces of the instrument, ports, controls, etc.. (this I know from first hand experience Re: the MDO4104C )nor do they have isolation between the input channels and the various networking protocols.
HP that's right! Avcom was first on market with TDO-FDO combos but they didn't call them MDO so ur prolly right abt Tek trademarkGranting that 'MDO' may indeed be a Tektronix 'trademark' -- To be certain, said 'designation' enjoys longtime adoption as a 'form taxonomy'![]()
Electrician WRONG! _Portable_ PSU isn't standard but it's vendor option that buyer is totally crazy not to order!none of the instruments can be battery operated
Electrician they're insulated just as HP says except it's 750v DC and 1500v Pk-Pk total excursion (which is basically redundant if you think on it).nor do they have isolation between the input channels and the various networking protocols.
HP Don't worry! You recall rightBut then I seem to recall availability of said option at the time I ordered @Jazz2C's replacement MDO3104![]()
HP I agree! Even though they're basically the _Harbor Freight_ end of Tek lineif your belabourment of this issue owes to said instruments' 'bargain basement' pricing - I hear you (I was initially skeptical myself)! -- That said, they really do meet their specs
Happy days (daze?) -- No Namenda for HP anytime soon!HP Don't worry! You recall right!
And I would say said instruments represent Tektronix quality at Harbour Freight pricingthough they're basically the _Harbor Freight_ end of Tek line![]()
DITTO! -- Ya getting this @Jazz2C ?I've never seen a failure that wasn't fault of user!
There is indeed something to be said for test equipment one is not tempted to pamper!they function as speced which like you say is perfect for just casual general purpose field use cuz of super low cost!
--Emphasis Added--So just in case you're really worried abt safety you can relax cuz I'm saying that if I didn't know what equipment someone was using I'd just suggest using RC filter and dmm for reading offset on line (which I say is accurate enough for most purposes)!
While safety is always on-topic I tend to agree with your assertion to the effect that this is indeed 'well explored territory'...So as far as I'm concerned this topic of scope safety is now talked out! Time to move on!
Sounds like an excellent opportunity to 'upgrade' to 3-Phase service?PS -- Offset is caused by equipment of neighbor on same secondary, so I'm having hydro install dedicated _pole pig_ for my property! So it's nice to have problem just solved
!
HP All I know is it has something to do with his _solar power station_ which I say is more work than it's worth even if it was on equator but at latitude of like 52° it's just totally lameI'm certain we're all dyin' to know the nature of the 'offending' load? -- Would I be far off 'the mark' was I to guess some manner of 'transformerless' battery charger?![]()
#12 afaik transformer is okMy experience with field failures has always been about resistance in the "common" wiring from the center tap to the load.
HP there's just single phase line for primary so when I asked abt that last year hydro gave me option of running a 3-phase spur from substation 45 km away or installing big rotary converter (Cuz I don't want electronic phase converter cuz they totally suck for reliabilitySounds like an excellent opportunity to 'upgrade' to 3-Phase service?![]()
I dunno... I too have often thought (albeit it not 'deeply') that construction of a stationary transformer featuring three windings/taps separated by electrical angles of 120° should be feasible... That said, inasmuch as I've not heard tell of such apparatus, I must assume same to be inadmissibly inefficient or otherwise impractical...HP FWIW I don't understand why that can't just be done with special transformer
Re: standard distribution equipment: I cannot envision development of 120° phase-shifts from a single-phase line via stationary (i.e. non-rotary) transformation devices?like feeding single phase across one leg of wye network and then just taking 3-phase off ends of legs as usual?
I asked abt that last year hydro gave me option of running a 3-phase spur from substation 45 km away or installing big rotary converter
The fact that they offered the 'spur' option tells me that an existing corridor/'right of way' accommodative of same is currently available (likely a matter of merely 're-wiring' existing poles)So anyhow I can ask hydro which option can be done soonest
Well you know - you're preaching to the choir in that regard!I don't want electronic phase converter cuz they totally suck for reliability!
If it's any consolation - there seems to be plenty of that around!Sry cuz of being basically clueless abt magnetic components![]()
HP so ur saying that like delta-wye xfmr is just 3 sets of windings on 3 totally separate closed magnetic circuits? Cuz if so I say that's really just three single phase xfmrs with primaries wired in delta configuration and secondaries wired for wye configuration and vice versa!I cannot envision development of 120° phase-shifts from a single-phase line via stationary (i.e. non-rotary) transformation devices?![]()
HP I agree it's theoretically possible but it's hard to think on when number of phases is odd w/o using rotating secondary to generate missing excitation phasesI too have often thought (albeit it not 'deeply') that construction of a stationary transformer featuring three windings/taps separated by electrical angles of 120° should be feasible
HP that's prolly right but I say hydro will still take their own sweet time getting job doneThe fact that they offered the 'spur' option tells me that an existing corridor/'right of way' accommodative of same is currently available (likely a matter of merely 're-wiring' existing poles)![]()
HP it's not as electrically solid as proper 3∅ service and even though there are no brushes it's still moving parts running all the time! So that's huge reliability fail right thereThat said, a large 'rotary converter' is a good option also!
Ok super cop-out alert! I say reason most ppl are weak on magnetics is fault of education system and scientific, engineering and hobby publishing community cuz electronics is treated like the science it is but magnetics is mostly treated as just idgit vocational tradesman BS! One exception used to be RF xfmrs (like baluns and TLTs and like that) but so many crybabies were complaining it's too complicated for their lazy feeble minds to grasp that ARRL basically dumbed down their handbook to pacify the losersIf it's any consolation - there seems to be plenty of that around!![]()
No wrinkles here - yetI've said before, I would love to spend a week with you two, but I'd probably find you are as wrinkly as I am
As regards Aleph's 'off-list' 'insufferability' - In her own words:and Aleph is insufferable.![]()
ppl say I come across as just _overcompensating young professional_ when out of Aleph characterSo I prefer dumb but likeable web persona
!
By 'cheap' I meant merely that the price is very low -- Absolutely no aspersions upon quality intended!what you do that makes an MDO 'scope seem cheap at several thousand dollars.
---Emphasis Added---I've seen both of you leap to correct conclusions that I can't figure out after you showed me how you did it
But then, where applicable, 'DIY' projects have educational value and, not uncommonly, yield better end results than obtainable via (equivalent) commercially available products (if only by dint of 'tailorability'/serviceability)I've caught you in some penny wise and pound foolish adventures.
As an 'off the cuff', purely hypothetical example: Investment of $2M in a private 'wind farm' with the aim of saving $25k/Yr in utility fees comes to mindI'd love to see how you think that creates such a contradiction.
"ppl say I come across as just _overcompensating young professional_ when out of Aleph characterAs regards Aleph's 'off-list' 'insufferability' - In her own words:
Completely unnecessary explanation. Sorry about using a word with different interpretations available.By 'cheap' I meant merely that the price is very low
I'm talking about discarding enough stainless steel to make a year's pay for me and being glad he didn't charge you to haul it away.'DIY' projects have educational value and,
FWIW, that made my evening! ROFLA customer said, "You look like you're too young to fix TVs." I replied, "You look like you're about 80 and you can't fix 'em, so what does age have to do with it?"
@#12 what can I say? At a price of Ca. $20k, said instrument is an excellent (IMO almost too good to be true) value! -- But then you needn't take my word for it - have a gander at prices of other instruments offering similar functionality, service contract/warranty , etc...How bad was it?So bad that you completely escaped explaining how you can spend a year of my disposable income and call it a bargain.
(You must be getting paid well for your, "research"!)
You must be getting paid well for your, "research"!
@#12 Why is it so difficult to understand that I wanted rid of that steel ASAP if not sooner! (a service for which I fully expected to pay upwards of $100k) -- Hence my surprise and delight at their eagerness to begin work the very afternoon I called - free of charge! -- When one experiences an embarrassing setback (as did I via discovery that I'd purchased the 'wrong grade' of 'stainless') one wishes to 'erase the error' and 'get back on track' immediately!-- Perhaps you'd feel likewise had you 24 tons of 'I'm stupid' staring you in the face?I'm talking about discarding enough stainless steel to make a year's pay for me and being glad he didn't charge you to haul it away.
Not quite! They put in a great deal of hard, hazardous work cutting, loading and hauling -- The value of said labour, IMO far exceeding scrap value!and you just gave it away!"![]()
Such disrespect for your elders?!A customer said, "You look like you're too young to fix TVs." I replied, "You look like you're about 80 and you can't fix 'em, so what does age have to do with it?"
A bit of thought brings this idea: "Getting real" changed how I present myself and people can sense my perspicuity.Apparently "getting real" put some credits in my Karma account and I never had to do that again.![]()
That isn't the question. The question is, "How could you discard such a precious metal for free?" To people like me, it is like requesting I remove the offensive chunks of gold discourteously littering your lawn. For Dog's sake! There are people collecting empty aluminum cans to survive! Gawd, I wish I had customers like you!!!Why is it so difficult to understand that I wanted rid of that steel ASAP if not sooner!
No, the last house call at the end of a truly miserable day caused a complete lack of empathy.Disrespect for your elders?! Tisk, tisk, tisk![]()
And therein lies the 'crux' of our misunderstanding! They 'payed' plenty for the metal with their hard work and adherence to my stringent 'time table'! --- Come to that, it might be said that I was rid of the metal for free!"How could you discard such a precious metal for free?"
Ya know... that reminds me of my parents' demands that I 'eat my Brussels sprouts ' on the basis that people were starving 'overseas'For Dog's sake! There are people collecting empty aluminum cans to survive!
That stumps me. How is there a tax burden for no income at all? Possibly a tax write-off for your loss, but I can't figure out how you owed more taxes.Please be advised that I remitted the entirety of my tax burden associated with said transaction...
Under Mn state law sales tax extends to 'barter transactions' hence my stipulation that the value of services rendered me (via removal of the steel) equaled the scrap value of same (which being the maximum tenderable stipulation of 'taxable worth' in said case)... Hence my liability (as a seller) ≈ $1500 following each jurisdiction's 'take'...That stumps me. How is there a tax burden for no income at all? Possibly a tax write-off for your loss, but I can't figure out how you owed more taxes.
Actually, he lives in a panhandle... the difference is subtle, but the annoying weather is the sameI suppose a it's little enough compensation for living in a rather large sauna!![]()
Actually, he lives in a panhandle... the difference is subtle, but the annoying weather is the same![]()