A team of researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) has successfully demonstrated wireless transmission of power over a distance of one kilometer (0.621 miles), the U.S. Navy said in a press release.
A team of researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) has successfully demonstrated wireless transmission of power over a distance of one kilometer (0.621 miles), the U.S. Navy said in a press release.
I thought the motivation behind abandoning fossil fuels was to the reduce greenhouse gasses and therefore reduce the heating of the planet. So how does it help to collect energy that was heating another planet and beam it to earth? Aren't we bombarded with more than enough energy already without bringing in more? Won't this add to the problem? Any destruction we can do is currently limited to that which we can achieve by burning up what is already here, and unless someone can explain why I'm wrong, I think it's best we keep it that way.The idea of beaming energy wireless has been around for decades, but it is gaining steam again as humanity looks to change its ways of harnessing energy. While the concept of setting up solar farms on other planets and beaming back power to the Earth is still far from reality, the U.S. military could ensure energy security for its troops as it looks to cut its dependence on fossil fuels
That's less alarming to me. Taking what's already here, and using it. Maybe it's still not good, bringing heat from the core and releasing it on the surface, I don't know. I don't really understand anything on this scale. But the idea of releasing heat on the surface of this planet that was imported from another planet, just seems like a bad and unnecessary call to this layman.There are also plans to develop technology to pump heat out of the earth. Maybe we'll eventually reach a balance of sorts in the next few centuries.
That's *not* what I meant. I meant pumping heat out of the atmosphere (and even the oceans) and onto space. Pumping heat out of the core would not be a good idea in the long term, because the core itself is responsible for the planet's protective magnetic field.That's less alarming to me. Taking what's already here, and using it. Maybe it's still not good, bringing heat from the core and releasing it on the surface, I don't know. I don't really understand anything on this scale. But the idea of releasing heat on the surface of this planet that was imported from another planet, just seems like a bad and unnecessary call to this layman.
Also the idea of walking through unguarded and invisible microwave beams seems hazardous to me, even if deemed "intrinsically safe" by whoever. But now I am probably talking out of the same ignorance that causes people to decry nuclear power, and that irks me badly, so I will stop. Maybe I will better inform myself. Probably not. Maybe later.
There are proposals out there about building a huge ring around the earth, about 1 km wide, that would be populated with solar cells, and a few stations at the equator (about 8 or 12) that would collect the energy beams produced at the ring and turn them into electricity. That would require clearing a small area of a few square kilometers for safety purposes, and also the enforcement of no fly zones. It would be minimally intrusive for the environment, IMHO.Also the idea of walking through unguarded and invisible microwave beams seems hazardous to me, even if deemed "intrinsically safe" by whoever.
OK. What's so special about it? 10 gigahertz (GHz) microwave beams at utility scale power ranges are 'safe'?
I just don't see how beaming power from space will be cost competitive with ground based solar and storage.The June 5, 1975 NASA JPL Goldstone Demonstration of high power long distance wireless power transmission successfully transmitted 34kw of electrical power a distance of 1.5km at an efficiency of greater than 82%. At the time, it was the world record for high power long distance wireless power transmission, and it may remain the world record yet today.
OK. What's so special about it? 10 gigahertz (GHz) microwave beams at utility scale power ranges are 'safe'?
I just don't see how beaming power from space will be cost competitive with ground based solar and storage.
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Aaron Carman