I have been wondering about magnetic fields and the back-emfs they can create when they collapse.
My question is how does they magnetic field creates this back-emf?
I have thought before that magnetic fields could overlap/intersect (well actually not sure, had my doubts).
Example. A transformer, I thought that the secondary, when it's field built up from the current would then travel across the core and induce a back-emf.
hence the overlap/intersect idea.
But now I have researched some more and have found this cannot be the case.
Instead all the secondary's Field can do is effect the primary's field, so when the primary collapses back, it generates the back-emf, just smaller because the secondary effect on the primarys flux.
Is this correct?
This leads me to one more question, lol
I want to test it but Radio shack is really far, lol
Two coils, Coil A and Coil B , both are very close, so the effect is greatest
Coil A is kept at steady state (A normal DC Electromagnet )
Coil B is then powered up very quick.
result=
1.Coil A will feel the Induced voltage from Coil B,
Coil A's voltage will decrease then rise back up after Coil B is at steady state
This would be the MAGNETIC FIELDS CAN OVERLAP/INTERSECT.
2. Coil A will feel nothing since it is not changing. Since it is not changing, even if it's flux decreases, the field is not collapsing back with less flux which would induce less voltage and so the net voltage would be greater causing greater power pull. NO CHANGE AT ALL ON COIL A
Before I thought it might be 1. But after more research, I am leaning more towards 2.
Help on this would be greatly appreciated as my mind is going crazy with this idea.
My question is how does they magnetic field creates this back-emf?
I have thought before that magnetic fields could overlap/intersect (well actually not sure, had my doubts).
Example. A transformer, I thought that the secondary, when it's field built up from the current would then travel across the core and induce a back-emf.
hence the overlap/intersect idea.
But now I have researched some more and have found this cannot be the case.
Instead all the secondary's Field can do is effect the primary's field, so when the primary collapses back, it generates the back-emf, just smaller because the secondary effect on the primarys flux.
Is this correct?
This leads me to one more question, lol
I want to test it but Radio shack is really far, lol
Two coils, Coil A and Coil B , both are very close, so the effect is greatest
Coil A is kept at steady state (A normal DC Electromagnet )
Coil B is then powered up very quick.
result=
1.Coil A will feel the Induced voltage from Coil B,
Coil A's voltage will decrease then rise back up after Coil B is at steady state
This would be the MAGNETIC FIELDS CAN OVERLAP/INTERSECT.
2. Coil A will feel nothing since it is not changing. Since it is not changing, even if it's flux decreases, the field is not collapsing back with less flux which would induce less voltage and so the net voltage would be greater causing greater power pull. NO CHANGE AT ALL ON COIL A
Before I thought it might be 1. But after more research, I am leaning more towards 2.
Help on this would be greatly appreciated as my mind is going crazy with this idea.