Thank you sir, it really helpsIt's a dreadful design - there's nothing to stabilise the bias as the temperature changes. If it were to be biassed into Class AB, it would blow up. It's only stable against temperature changes in temperature if it's firmly in class B, in which case it's quality would barely be good enough for announcing "This vehicle is reversing".
The typical LF351 supply current is 1.4mA, so only 280mV across base and emitter, it appears to have been designed so that it doesn't get into class AB even with the LF351 supply current at the max. value on the datasheet of 3.4mA.
Thanks for your response, sirI was going to suggest they were on at 600mV, but then I realized they are Darlingtons, so class B. Without DC feedback, I think this will have terrible crossover distortion.
Bob
My professor took this for us as a term project for final. And he didnt teach us about class of amplifiers so that's why I'm confuse a little bitHello,
I have seen simelar designs.
In those the resistor on the output of the opamp (R6 in the OP schematic) was much lower, to force current in the power lines of the opamp.
In the designs I have seen the value was between 47 and 100 Ohms.
Bertus
Thank you for you reply, sirI am going to hazard a guess and say Class B.
The opamp supply current is 2-3mA. Hence Q1 and Q2 base bias is between 400-600mV.
But at idle, that doesn't force any current through the power pins. The output is at zero, so no current flows through R6 no matter how low it is.Hello,
I have seen simelar designs.
In those the resistor on the output of the opamp (R6 in the OP schematic) was much lower, to force current in the power lines of the opamp.
In the designs I have seen the value was between 47 and 100 Ohms.
Bertus
It would if a single supply was used and biased ti 1/2 the supply.But at idle, that doesn't force any current through the power pins. The output is at zero, so no current flows through R6 no matter how low it is.
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz