And now for something weird...

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,330
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448771/free-speech-wins-again-supreme-court
If you’re a lawyer arguing against free speech at the Supreme Court, be prepared to lose. Today the Court affirmed once again the Constitution’s strong protections against governmental viewpoint discrimination, even when the viewpoint discrimination is directed against “offensive” speech. In Matal v. Tam, the Court considered the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s refusal to register a trademark for a band called “The Slants” on the grounds that the name violated provisions of the Lanham Act that prohibited registering trademarks that “disparage . . . or bring into contemp[t] or disrepute” any “persons, living or dead.”
...
Time and again, SCOTUS has defended free expression. Today was no exception. Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Alito noted that the Patent and Trademark Office was essentially arguing that “the Government has an interest in preventing speech expressing ideas that offend.” His response was decisive: [A]s we have explained, that idea strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.” Quick, someone alert the snowflakes shouting down speeches on campus or rushing stages in New York. There is no constitutional exception for so-called “hate speech.” Indeed, governments are under an obligation to protect controversial expression. Every justice agrees.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,330
"Quick, someone alert the snowflakes shouting down speeches on campus or rushing stages in New York. There is no constitutional exception for so-called “hate speech.”
 

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,768
Deliciously lethal:

“As long as you don’t use a copious amount of it – obviously a copious amount could cause death – it really is delicious,” says Thomas Raquel, head pastry chef at the Michelin-starred Le Bernardin in New York, not particularly reassuringly.

Selling tonka beans to eat has been illegal in the US since 1954. Foods containing tonka are considered to be ‘adulterated’, though that hasn’t stopped them appearing on the menus of Michelin-starred restaurants, from New York to California. In fact, the United States is the biggest importer of tonka on the planet.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,330
Here's something weird. Students at Evergreen State College have gone completely nuts. Look at the video to see the worst case of, "disconnected from reality" I have ever seen.
https://reason.com/blog/2017/06/17/if-you-think-campus-free-speech-is-no-bi
Welcome to what pretends to be free expression and thought in the PNW young liberal world. This is a mental illness where the rejection of race based actions is racism and any free speech not in that young liberal world is alt-right Nazism.

This is not a College, Evergreen State is child-care.
 
Last edited:

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,330
http://www.kgw.com/news/man-struck-by-two-trains-in-se-portland/450845824
PORTLAND, Ore. -- A man struck by two trains in Southeast Portland Tuesday night suffered life-threatening injuries.

On Tuesday June 20, 2017, at 8:23 p.m., police officers responded to Southeast 8th Avenue and Southeast Division Street on the report of a pedestrian struck by a train.

Officers and medical personnel arrived and located a man with life-threatening injuries.

The man was transported to a Portland hospital by ambulance.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,330

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
Here's my weird for today: If you offered the U.S. Congress a bill to outlaw American funding of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, what would happen?:)

No need to wonder. It already happened and H.R.608 received 13 votes in favor, out of 247 Representatives.o_O
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/co...esentatives-sign-bill-stop-arming-terrorists/

What? I thought people were being locked up for decades for sending money to those terrorists!:confused:
Well, American citizens are, but our government wouldn't pass a law against it if it applied to them.:mad:
That tells me a lot about who is running our country...and it isn't us.:(
 

shortbus

Joined Sep 30, 2009
10,050
Here's my weird for today: If you offered the U.S. Congress a bill to outlaw American funding of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, what would happen?:)

No need to wonder. It already happened and H.R.608 received 13 votes in favor, out of 247 Representatives.o_O
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/co...esentatives-sign-bill-stop-arming-terrorists/

What? I thought people were being locked up for decades for sending money to those terrorists!:confused:
Well, American citizens are, but our government wouldn't pass a law against it if it applied to them.:mad:
That tells me a lot about who is running our country...and it isn't us.:(
As bad or worse than the whole heroin and cocaine debacle. Allowing the military and CIA to bring those drugs into the US and then starting the 'war on drugs'. I'd say worse, because the drugs had a real consequence in the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Drugs

The History Channel had a mini-series on it this week.
http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/8-times-americas-war-on-drugs-was-stranger-than-fiction
 
Top