http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448771/free-speech-wins-again-supreme-courtThey get their day in court.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/12/symposium-free-speech-argument-registering-disparaging-trademarks/
If you’re a lawyer arguing against free speech at the Supreme Court, be prepared to lose. Today the Court affirmed once again the Constitution’s strong protections against governmental viewpoint discrimination, even when the viewpoint discrimination is directed against “offensive” speech. In Matal v. Tam, the Court considered the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s refusal to register a trademark for a band called “The Slants” on the grounds that the name violated provisions of the Lanham Act that prohibited registering trademarks that “disparage . . . or bring into contemp[t] or disrepute” any “persons, living or dead.”
...
Time and again, SCOTUS has defended free expression. Today was no exception. Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Alito noted that the Patent and Trademark Office was essentially arguing that “the Government has an interest in preventing speech expressing ideas that offend.” His response was decisive: [A]s we have explained, that idea strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.” Quick, someone alert the snowflakes shouting down speeches on campus or rushing stages in New York. There is no constitutional exception for so-called “hate speech.” Indeed, governments are under an obligation to protect controversial expression. Every justice agrees.
Does that include right wing snowflakes?
Welcome to what pretends to be free expression and thought in the PNW young liberal world. This is a mental illness where the rejection of race based actions is racism and any free speech not in that young liberal world is alt-right Nazism.Here's something weird. Students at Evergreen State College have gone completely nuts. Look at the video to see the worst case of, "disconnected from reality" I have ever seen.
https://reason.com/blog/2017/06/17/if-you-think-campus-free-speech-is-no-bi
Lee said the cocktail comes with one key rule: "You can drink it fast, you can drink it slow, but your lips have gotta touch the toe."
PORTLAND, Ore. -- A man struck by two trains in Southeast Portland Tuesday night suffered life-threatening injuries.
On Tuesday June 20, 2017, at 8:23 p.m., police officers responded to Southeast 8th Avenue and Southeast Division Street on the report of a pedestrian struck by a train.
Officers and medical personnel arrived and located a man with life-threatening injuries.
The man was transported to a Portland hospital by ambulance.
The weird part about this news is not that he got struck by two different trains, but that he actually survived!
He must have been a drunk Russian.The weird part about this news is not that he got struck by two different trains, but that he actually survived!![]()
Was this car?was the truck ok
According to the Albany Police Department, the driver of the vehicle, Albany resident Mariano Acosta Aguilera, 51, was arrested on charges of DUII alcohol and reckless driving. He was also cited for not having a driver's license.
As bad or worse than the whole heroin and cocaine debacle. Allowing the military and CIA to bring those drugs into the US and then starting the 'war on drugs'. I'd say worse, because the drugs had a real consequence in the US.Here's my weird for today: If you offered the U.S. Congress a bill to outlaw American funding of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, what would happen?
No need to wonder. It already happened and H.R.608 received 13 votes in favor, out of 247 Representatives.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/co...esentatives-sign-bill-stop-arming-terrorists/
What? I thought people were being locked up for decades for sending money to those terrorists!
Well, American citizens are, but our government wouldn't pass a law against it if it applied to them.
That tells me a lot about who is running our country...and it isn't us.![]()
The lumber industry here does the same thing. But they claim they do that because that's the lumber real measurement before plaining.Home Depot being sued for selling 3.5"x3.5" lumber as 4x4.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/money...uits-over-descriptions-lumber-size/405300001/
Doesn't everyone know that a 4x4 actually measures 3.5x3.5?
Chocolate milk, brown cows?Home Depot being sued for selling 3.5"x3.5" lumber as 4x4.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/money...uits-over-descriptions-lumber-size/405300001/
Doesn't everyone know that a 4x4 actually measures 3.5x3.5?