No, there are tons of good websites, EE and physics books that go into the centuries old details. I don''t have the patience or desire to be a teacher.
View attachment 269143

https://books.google.com/books?id=UkBGAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA234&lpg=PA234&dq=nothing+in+basic+electrical+training+books+or+circuit+theory+that+says+the+charge+carriers+(current)+are+the+energy+carriers.&source=bl&ots=FF84aRJRhC&sig=ACfU3U0bh0ga8wVPTf5xCi4Tl8wXcG8mtQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjF3ryq7qH4AhVbK30KHafaDSAQ6AF6BAg5EAM#v=onepage&q=nothing in basic electrical training books or circuit theory that says the charge carriers (current) are the energy carriers.&f=false



The strange thing is there is nothing in modern circuit theory that says the charge carriers (current) are the transmission energy carriers. Most people get the idea from bad analogies, not formal training. Current is an important part of the equation as a system and things like AC current are a hell of a lot more intuitive when you put current in its proper place within the energy transfer equation.

https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/what-is-electricity/all

I watched your video and it backs up my claim that an intuitive response is not a substitute for the math. In fact when I ask questions here I largely ignore ones without a reference to the research and most posts for that matter.

 

I watched your video and it backs up my claim that an intuitive response is not a substitute for the math. In fact when I ask questions here I largely ignore ones without a reference to the research and most posts for that matter.

And you are definitely a teacher whether you regard yourself as so. If not then why post and help? I really hope it's not because of ego!