bountyhunter
- Joined Sep 7, 2009
- 2,512
But only when people take it seriously and overlook the inherent silliness of the whole subject.That's exactly what I was thinking. This kind of conversation can become heated and opinionated very quickly.
But only when people take it seriously and overlook the inherent silliness of the whole subject.That's exactly what I was thinking. This kind of conversation can become heated and opinionated very quickly.
Not necessarily. Things like IM (intermodulation) distortion or bad transient response can cause poor sound and those will not necessarily show up in a harmonic distortion analysis or frequency response test using single-frequency sine-waves.Yeah but even if the amplifier does accurately reproduce pure sine-waves at all frequencies within the range that it's designed to work at (in this case 20-20khz) , does that guarantee that It will faithfully reproduce a very complex sound with high dynamic demands ?
Could you explain what you mean by 'Transient response ' ?Not necessarily. Things like IM (intermodulation) distortion or bad transient response can cause poor sound and those will not necessarily show up in a harmonic distortion analysis or frequency response test using single-frequency sine-waves.
TIM (transient intermodulation distortion) and transient response just mean that if a signal changes very quickly like the leading edge of a square wave, the output of the amp can't follow it precisely. The amp goes into a mode called slewing and there is a finite time lag until it "arrives" at the new level where the feedback loop starts controlling the amp again.Could you explain what you mean by 'Transient response ' ?
Does that mean the transition of one state (voltage perhaps) to another?
For some years following the introduction of solid state amplifiers, their perceived sound did not have the excellent audio quality of the best valve amplifiers (see valve audio amplifier). This led audiophiles to believe that valve sound had an intrinsic quality due to the vacuum tube technology itself. In 1972, Matti Otala demonstrated the origin of a previously unobserved form of distortion: transient intermodulation distortion (TIM), also called slew rate distortion. TIM distortion was found to occur during very rapid increases in amplifier output voltage.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_power_amplifier#cite_note-3 TIM did not appear at steady state sine tone measurements, helping to hide it from design engineers prior to 1972. Problems with TIM distortion stem from reduced open loop frequency response of solid state amplifiers. Further works of Otala and other authors found the solution for TIM distortion, including increasing slew rate, decreasing preamp frequency bandwidth, and the insertion of a lag compensation circuit in the input stage of the amplifier.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_power_amplifier#cite_note-4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_power_amplifier#cite_note-5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_power_amplifier#cite_note-6 In high quality modern amplifiers the open loop response is at least 20 kHz, canceling TIM distortion. However, TIM distortion is still present in most low price home quality power amplifiers.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed
Keep in mind that the monitors you're looking at are firmly in the 'budget' category. A company isn't likely to put significant engineering resources into a unique amplifier design at that price point. They're going to find a ready-made solution to do the job.Greetings!
I've recently unscrewed the back of my M-Audio BX5's to take a curious look on the insides and the amplifier circuit.
I've been playing around with electronics for about half a year now so i'm still a newbie... but upon examination of the main pcb I expected to see power BJT amps fueling the sound but instead what I found is some wierd many-legged IC attached to the main heatsink . After looking it the datasheets I discovered that It was an integrated audio amplifier which left me scratching my head.
Well yeah .. I know they are budget but still I expected it to have something more than an integrated amplifier , but yeah what you said make sense .Keep in mind that the monitors you're looking at are firmly in the 'budget' category. A company isn't likely to put significant engineering resources into a unique amplifier design at that price point. They're going to find a ready-made solution to do the job.
Interesting Review:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2404801,00.asp
I thought the Bottom Line comment - these sound better than they should - was interesting. It points out something I think is very revealing. You don't need to spend a lot to get good performance.
I was impressed by the fact that at this price range these speakers were bi-amped.
Bi-amping can be a great benefit for a number of reasons. First of all, the need for inductors in series with the woofer can be eliminated. Second the bass-low mid frequencies which require the majority of the power can be separated from the mid-high frequencies to lessen inter-modulation issues.
Third the amp can be connected to the drivers with very short, lo-z connections.
You will also need to build some kind of switching power supply to boost up the car's 12V line to get that kind of power. Those are built into the amps you buy, along with the crossovers.Thanks alot bountyhunter and crutchshow for the answers.
They confirmed by theories of what I intuitively though 'transient response' was.
Another reason why I'm asking is because I want to make a 100watt car subwoofer amplifier for a friend of mind and I have no experience in power amplifiers but I'm guessing transient response will be important for sharp bass kicks
What do you mean ? Boost the cars voltage up ?You will also need to build some kind of switching power supply to boost up the car's 12V line to get that kind of power. Those are built into the amps you buy, along with the crossovers.
P=E^2/R. To get 100 watts into a typical 4 ohm load requires about 20 volts RMS, which is about 56 volts Peak to Peak. You would need a few volts extra to account for circuit losses, so you might want about 60 volts available.What do you mean ? Boost the cars voltage up ?
Can't I just use power transistors in the end stage to give me about 10 amps ?
Hmm and how would I get 60 volts from 12?P=E^2/R. To get 100 watts into a typical 4 ohm load requires about 20 volts RMS, which is about 56 volts Peak to Peak. You would need a few volts extra to account for circuit losses, so you might want about 60 volts available.
A split supply is normally used, so the output will idle at 0 volts. This allows the speaker to be directly coupled to the amp.
That's one of the reasons active monitors became popular: the amps can be matched to the speakers, and biamping is easy, and both are benefits.Second the bass-low mid frequencies which require the majority of the power can be separated from the mid-high frequencies to lessen inter-modulation issues.
Third the amp can be connected to the drivers with very short, lo-z connections.
...To reiterate my last sentence, these days an integrated amplifier doesn't necessarily mean a low quality one. But more to my point about them being budget monitors is that, given a certain price point, a speaker manufacturer will choose how much engineering to put into the amp and how much to put into the enlosure. Quality integrated amps can be chosen without much difficulty, but quality acoustic design of the enclosure is more unique to the product at hand.Well yeah .. I know they are budget but still I expected it to have something more than an integrated amplifier , but yeah what you said make sense .
by Don Wilcher
by Duane Benson
by Duane Benson
by Duane Benson