Thanks for your advice, and the reply!Note that I have reduced the 180 Ohm resistor and even connected it in the wrong way for more effect. It is possible not to change the connection method, but also to reduce the resistor to 100 Ohm. Don't be afraid, at current through the choke 1 A it is quite linear and will not go into saturation. I had to look for the core material on the Internet more than once. And it's never been difficult to find what kind of material. The truth is, I did ask GooGle in Russian. Using Schottky's diode will further increase the output voltage by at least 0.5V. In this scheme, using 1N4148 is not successful. On it, with such a high current for it, a lot of voltage drops (1.5 - 2 V). The diode you use causes high losses because it is slow.
Thank you very much!Judging by your messages, your indicator consumes more (significantly more) with a lower power supply. I will continue to think how to help you.
Is there a built-in voltage pulse converter in your indicator?
Yes, they are IN-14.What nixie are you using? IN-14?
Thanks for your reply and simulate, the result of the simulation is close to the true circuit.So I've calculated the established process. With the additional capacitor, the consumption current is 83 mA, and without the capacitor 350 mA AND the voltage has not reached the required value.
I add a 1u/250v capacitor parallel with R51, but I can't find UF4007 at three electronic stores in my city, so the diode I'll replace after the product delivery, maybe a week later.I have not been able to increase the load capacity of your pulsed stabilizer in a simple way without greatly complicating the circuitry. The only chance is to make the high-voltage stabilizer run smoothly over time. I've done this before by bypassing the upper divider resistor with a capacitor. It'll make the consumption current rise smoother. I propose to parallel the R51 resistor with a capacitor of 1 µF (200 V) or more. We'll have to experiment.
by Aaron Carman
by Jake Hertz
by Robert Keim
by Jake Hertz