Tesla’s invention did not use a core. It was a way to avoid capacitors, which, at that time were not very good. His idea was to use two equal coils wound pancake style, and insulated from one another. The end of one coil was connected to the start of the other, so it was effectively one larger coil made of two laminated layers.Bifilar wound double wires over ferrite rod core has both inductance and capacitance at the same time. What are benefits/ uses, as a transformer or special end uses? I believe Tesla had a special flat style wound wire coil made that way.
There are several applications for having identical coils in a transformer. Signal isolation would be one of them.Bifilar wound double wires over ferrite rod core has both inductance and capacitance at the same time. What are benefits/ uses, as a transformer or special end uses? I believe Tesla had a special flat style wound wire coil made that way.
Tesla‘s patent is for bifilar flat wound coils and it had a particular application. I don’t know if it was every commercially useful but his intention was to replace the dodgy capacitors available at the time.Don't really care about what Tesla does with anything including coils. There is nothing special with flat wound coils.
Tesla‘s patent is for bifilar flat wound coils and it had a particular application. I don’t know if it was every commercially useful but his intention was to replace the dodgy capacitors available at the time.
I was primarily responding to:Really don't care about Tesla. He owes the people of the United States $12 Billion.
Your personal beef with a dead man is not subject of the thread, but bifilar, flat wound inductors is. Tesla was mentioned, and he holds a patent on such a coil.There is nothing special with flat wound coils.
Don't know where that off-the-wall number comes from, but good luck getting him to pay.Really don't care about Tesla. He owes the people of the United States $12 Billion.