A pre-computed result from the super-deterministic time masters to fool us into thinking we have 'free will'.Big news regarding quantum supremacy:
A pre-computed result from the super-deterministic time masters to fool us into thinking we have 'free will'.Big news regarding quantum supremacy:
All bow and hail to the Supreme Simulator!A pre-computed result from the super-deterministic time masters to fool us into thinking we have 'free will'.
What she actually said that there was good reason to think that they do not exist... not that they definitely do not exist. This is because (at least on paper) wormholes are extremely hard to create and are extremely unstable too.Interesting.
The thing that shot out at me was that she states that worm holes do not really exist. I wonder how she proves this.
Well, if they didnt exist we would not have a hard time making them right? We simply would not be able to make them at allWhat she actually said that there was good reason to think that they do not exist... not that they definitely do not exist. This is because (at least on paper) wormholes are extremely hard to create and are extremely unstable too.
A company has revealed the results of benchmarking experiments that demonstrate how an advanced error-suppression method increased the probability of success for quantum computing algorithms to succeed on real hardware, according to a press release shared with Interesting Engineering via email.
2,500 percent more hope is still just more hope, for funding...
here's a thought ... what "singularity" do you think is going to happen first? Quantum Supremacy, or Sustained Nuclear Fusion?2,500 percent more hope is still just more hope, for funding...
Except...wave functions do not actually "collapse" and fusion can only surpass break-even within a Schwarzschild radius. In reality both are essentially impossible technologies.here's a thought ... what "singularity" do you think is going to happen first? Quantum Supremacy, or Sustained Nuclear Fusion?
First you need to think there will be a man-made singularity event that changes 'everything'. The last earth changing event was the The Industrial Revolution. If there is a "singularity" we are already in it and it's been happening for centuries.here's a thought ... what "singularity" do you think is going to happen first? Quantum Supremacy, or Sustained Nuclear Fusion?
I'd say we're living in the age of information, and the "the triggering event" (so as to avoid the term "singularity") was the arrival of the PC ...If there is a "singularity" we are already in it
Attained first? Maybe my grandkids will see both.Quantum computing in the maw of modern marketing
Hope (and hype) and reality are not the same thing.
And it’s not strictly only the true marketing professionals engaging in the hype, but a variety of amateurish promoters touting wild and unsubstantiated claims. Some of these are overly-enthusiastic media types, some of whom are legitimate journalists and some whose credentials are little more sturdy than blogging.
And in fact some of the hypesters are otherwise competent technical professionals who should know better. Normally, they would know better, but the maw of modern marketing still manages to suck people in despite their best intentions.
...
Press releases are of course the explicit and exclusive handiwork of true marketing professionals.
Actually there have been great advances in fusion technology and there is a big project going on right now i think in Europe for fusion research. They are now predicting that it will be possible in the near future.Except...wave functions do not actually "collapse" and fusion can only surpass break-even within a Schwarzschild radius. In reality both are essentially impossible technologies.
A hydrogen bomb surpasses break even. It just isn’t harnessable.fusion can only surpass break-even within a Schwarzschild radius
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | Problem in casing a laser module into a torch case | General Electronics Chat | 6 | |
Can we use polar capacitor in this case? | Sensor Design & Implementation | 11 | ||
K | What case compiler optimize the variable | Programming & Languages | 8 | |
The Case Against Patents | Off-Topic | 24 | ||
The Case Against Patents | Off-Topic | 18 |
by Jake Hertz
by Aaron Carman