Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.I did not say a piece of paper was a rectangle. I said a rectangle has 4 sides. If a rectangle has 4 sides then a piece of paper would have to have an additional 2. Front and back making it 6 sides.
Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.I did not say a piece of paper was a rectangle. I said a rectangle has 4 sides. If a rectangle has 4 sides then a piece of paper would have to have an additional 2. Front and back making it 6 sides.
Another excellent point.Also consider the infinite tangents to a circle, this applies to tangential planes in 3D.
Of course. Would you expect any other?Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.
That's why this thread is called "off-topic", everything seems to veer off topic.I love how we start at radioshack and end up on the fringes of particle physics and conceptual mathematics.
Well actually you said the "piece of paper has 6 sides" and "as do ALL pieces of paper".Actually I was speaking about a piece of paper. It has four sides. You could say it has 3. The outside edge and each face.
...
Not sure I follow your logic. How does a circle have one side? If you're referring to the face (what's within the outline) then that doesn't count as a side in this case.Re the circle, I like the idea that a circle has infinite sides, that makes sense. But a circle also has one side.
So DerStrom8 just proved that infinity = 1.
Infinity may not be a defined value, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.Since infinity doesn't exist I suppose it can equal anything we like.
A "side" does not have to conform to 100% straightness.Not sure I follow your logic. How does a circle have one side? If you're referring to the face (what's within the outline) then that doesn't count as a side in this case.
...