Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.I did not say a piece of paper was a rectangle. I said a rectangle has 4 sides. If a rectangle has 4 sides then a piece of paper would have to have an additional 2. Front and back making it 6 sides.
Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.I did not say a piece of paper was a rectangle. I said a rectangle has 4 sides. If a rectangle has 4 sides then a piece of paper would have to have an additional 2. Front and back making it 6 sides.
Another excellent point.Also consider the infinite tangents to a circle, this applies to tangential planes in 3D.
Of course. Would you expect any other?Ahh, I see. So we were both still in agreement.
That's why this thread is called "off-topic", everything seems to veer off topic.I love how we start at radioshack and end up on the fringes of particle physics and conceptual mathematics.![]()
Well actually you said the "piece of paper has 6 sides" and "as do ALL pieces of paper".Actually I was speaking about a piece of paper. It has four sides. You could say it has 3. The outside edge and each face.
...
Not sure I follow your logic. How does a circle have one side? If you're referring to the face (what's within the outline) then that doesn't count as a side in this case.Re the circle, I like the idea that a circle has infinite sides, that makes sense. But a circle also has one side.
So DerStrom8 just proved that infinity = 1.![]()
Infinity may not be a defined value, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.Since infinity doesn't exist I suppose it can equal anything we like.![]()
A "side" does not have to conform to 100% straightness.Not sure I follow your logic. How does a circle have one side? If you're referring to the face (what's within the outline) then that doesn't count as a side in this case.
...