If, when we heat things, molecules/atoms/subatomic particles gain energy, then, when things cool down, molecules/atoms/subatomic particles would loose energy and slow down. So, when it comes to superconductors, this would be the same, yet, supposedly, when a current is induced into a superconducting wire, the current aka subatomic particles aka electrons disobey/do not follow the pattern of loosing energy in/to the supercooled environment, and supposedly continue to flow forever in a loop conductor. Can someone explain: Q: why the current/electrons do not loose energy to the supercooled environment? In a clear and accurate fashion, pretty please? (I understand you might say the current does loose energy but extremely small amounts over time, but if you see how fast the supercooled conductor looses its energy, then please explain: Q: why did not the electrons composing the current loose its energy at the same rate as the superconductor and the other electrons, and continue to flow, seemingly endlessly?)