I was thinking the Buffalo Bills with four trips to the big game and no wins.I'm not sure I've ever seen a team win a Superbowl with virtually no offensive production.
Brownout said WIN with virtually no offensive productivity. Denver didn't score an offensive touchdown until near the end of the game.I was thinking the Buffalo Bills with four trips to the big game and no wins.
Yes, one offensive touchdown (virtually no production).I saw their touchdown and the two point conversion.
Yup, that touchdown drive was what? four yards?Yes, one offensive touchdown (virtually no production).
Much simpler than that, kubeek. It's a prediction that if you fail (remember, it is a 50%-50% chance) becomes BS.What´s SB? Snow balls?
Just like Cam Newton?It's a prediction that if you fail (remember, it is a 50%-50% chance) becomes BS.
He was a winner all season because he was able to rally his troops with his positive attitude, winning smile and high energy.Just like Cam Newton?
I thought it was a good non-overturn. Maybe I'm a little biased being more of a fan of Denver, but the receiver didn't control the ball throughout the play, so I liked the call. It was close, though, and could have easily gone the other way.[/QUOTE]PS: Even the announcers thought the challenged play would be over-turned.
He'll be fine. There was much expected form a man of only 26 years.He needs to re-evaluate his leadership role on that team and take some psychology classes and try again next year.
Doubt it. Denver had some calls not go their way too.It is possible that the NFL had pre-determined that the Manning going out as a winner story was possibly better than a young QB who is angry at the media winning story
Whether or not he controlled it "though the play" was not the question. The point is, he is allowed to bobble the ball for a half hour as his knees are down, while he is rolling on the ground or performing a yoga move - as long as the ball does not touch the ground. And it never did.I thought it was a good non-overturn. Maybe I'm a little biased being more of a fan of Denver, but the receiver didn't control the ball throughout the play, so I liked the call. It was close, though, and could have easily gone the other way.
To me it looks like it hit the ground twice. But hey, it's over.Whether or not he controlled it "though the play" was not the question. The point is, he is allowed to bobble the ball for a half hour as his knees are down, while he is rolling on the ground or performing a yoga move - as long as the ball does not touch the ground. And it never did.
The only time when the receiver must control the ball "through the play" is when he is sliding out of bound. He was in the center of the field.
Cam Newton was very down at the post-game conference. As one sportswriter put, Superman was replaced by the Incredible Sulk.To me it looks like it hit the ground twice. But hey, it's over.
http://www.sbnation.com/2016/2/7/10...tch-rules-carolina-panthers-jerricho-cotchery
Did Cam do something funny at the press conference?
I guess I can Google it.
That's a great angle looking at the play, and most likely the one the refs were looking at.To me it looks like it hit the ground twice. But hey, it's over.
http://www.sbnation.com/2016/2/7/10...tch-rules-carolina-panthers-jerricho-cotchery
It wasn't funny, but he abruptly walked out.Did Cam do something funny at the press conference?
I guess I can Google it.
Not exactly. The rule book says this:The only time when the receiver must control the ball "through the play" is when he is sliding out of bound. He was in the center of the field.
Wow!The Suberb Owl results are in... Broncos 24 - Panthers 10. I even got my $1 Big Mac!
View attachment 100290