Dear All,
The attachment is the paper I'm reading. I am curious about the (3) and (4) equation. Why do we have to multiply dφs by nSi to get dφsi and then integrate it to get φsi in (4) ?
Can we just integrate the (2) equation to get φsi?
Ps. To my understanding, please see the image file. The number conductors was taken into account in the (1) equation already. L*dY is the area perpendicular to u0*hs(Y). So, multiply these two terms and integrate the product along the Y-axis should get the total flux for a certain area.
The attachment is the paper I'm reading. I am curious about the (3) and (4) equation. Why do we have to multiply dφs by nSi to get dφsi and then integrate it to get φsi in (4) ?
Can we just integrate the (2) equation to get φsi?
Ps. To my understanding, please see the image file. The number conductors was taken into account in the (1) equation already. L*dY is the area perpendicular to u0*hs(Y). So, multiply these two terms and integrate the product along the Y-axis should get the total flux for a certain area.
Attachments
-
592.9 KB Views: 2
-
10.8 KB Views: 4